ID	1518043-4
sentence	We now report that the purified product of gerE (GerE) is a DNA-binding protein that adheres to the promoters for cotB and cotC.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'now',3,5)	word(2,'report',7,12)	word(3,'that',14,17)	word(4,'the',19,21)	word(5,'purified',23,30)	word(6,'product',32,38)	word(7,'of',40,41)	word(8,'gerE',43,46)	word(9,'GerE',49,52)	word(10,'is',55,56)	word(11,'a',58,58)	word(12,'DNA-binding',60,70)	word(13,'protein',72,78)	word(14,'that',80,83)	word(15,'adheres',85,91)	word(16,'to',93,94)	word(17,'the',96,98)	word(18,'promoters',100,108)	word(19,'for',110,112)	word(20,'cotB',114,117)	word(21,'and',119,121)	word(22,'cotC',123,126)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'now')	lemma(2,'report')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'purify')	lemma(6,'product')	lemma(7,'of')	lemma(8,'gerE')	lemma(9,'GerE')	lemma(10,'be')	lemma(11,'a')	lemma(12,'DNA-binding')	lemma(13,'protein')	lemma(14,'that')	lemma(15,'adhere')	lemma(16,'to')	lemma(17,'the')	lemma(18,'promoter')	lemma(19,'for')	lemma(20,'cotB')	lemma(21,'and')	lemma(22,'cotC')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',2,0)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',6,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',6,5)	relation('comp_for:N-N',18,22)	relation('comp_to:V-N',15,18)	relation('comp_of:N-N',6,8)	relation('appos',8,9)	relation('comp_for:N-N',18,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,1)	relation('subj:V-N',15,13)

ID	1537790-1
sentence	The spoIIG promoter is used by RNA polymerase containing sigma A (E sigma A), the primary form of RNA polymerase found in vegetative cells in Bacillus subtilis.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'spoIIG',4,9)	word(2,'promoter',11,18)	word(3,'is',20,21)	word(4,'used',23,26)	word(5,'by',28,29)	word(6,'RNA',31,33)	word(7,'polymerase',35,44)	word(8,'containing',46,55)	word(9,'sigma A',57,63)	word(10,'E sigma A',66,74)	word(11,'the',78,80)	word(12,'primary',82,88)	word(13,'form',90,93)	word(14,'of',95,96)	word(15,'RNA',98,100)	word(16,'polymerase',102,111)	word(17,'found',113,117)	word(18,'in',119,120)	word(19,'vegetative',122,131)	word(20,'cells',133,137)	word(21,'in',139,140)	word(22,'Bacillus subtilis',142,158)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'spoIIG')	lemma(2,'promoter')	lemma(3,'be')	lemma(4,'use')	lemma(5,'by')	lemma(6,'RNA')	lemma(7,'polymerase')	lemma(8,'contain')	lemma(9,'sigA')	lemma(10,'E sigma A')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'primary')	lemma(13,'form')	lemma(14,'of')	lemma(15,'RNA')	lemma(16,'polymerase')	lemma(17,'find')	lemma(18,'in')	lemma(19,'vegetative')	lemma(20,'cell')	lemma(21,'in')	lemma(22,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',4,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',20,22)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',20,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('appos',9,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('appos',7,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',17,20)	relation('subj:V-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',4,2)	relation('obj:V-N',8,9)	relation('comp_of:N-N',13,16)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',17,16)

ID	1569009-3
sentence	We directly tested this hypothesis by performing in vitro transcription assays with reconstituted E sigma H and a set of plasmids containing the kinA, spo0F, and spo0A promoter regions.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'directly',3,10)	word(2,'tested',12,17)	word(3,'this',19,22)	word(4,'hypothesis',24,33)	word(5,'by',35,36)	word(6,'performing',38,47)	word(7,'in',49,50)	word(8,'vitro',52,56)	word(9,'transcription',58,70)	word(10,'assays',72,77)	word(11,'with',79,82)	word(12,'reconstituted',84,96)	word(13,'E sigma H',98,106)	word(14,'and',108,110)	word(15,'a',112,112)	word(16,'set',114,116)	word(17,'of',118,119)	word(18,'plasmids',121,128)	word(19,'containing',130,139)	word(20,'the',141,143)	word(21,'kinA',145,148)	word(22,'spo0F',151,155)	word(23,'and',158,160)	word(24,'spo0A',162,166)	word(25,'promoter',168,175)	word(26,'regions',177,183)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'directly')	lemma(2,'test')	lemma(3,'this')	lemma(4,'hypothesis')	lemma(5,'by')	lemma(6,'perform')	lemma(7,'in')	lemma(8,'vitro')	lemma(9,'transcription')	lemma(10,'assay')	lemma(11,'with')	lemma(12,'reconstitute')	lemma(13,'E sigma H')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'a')	lemma(16,'set')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'plasmids')	lemma(19,'contain')	lemma(20,'the')	lemma(21,'kinA')	lemma(22,'spo0F')	lemma(23,'and')	lemma(24,'spo0A')	lemma(25,'promoter')	lemma(26,'region')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V-V',2,6)	relation('comp_with:N-N',10,16)	relation('comp_with:N-N',10,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',25,21)	relation('obj:V-N',19,26)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',13,12)	relation('subj:V-N',2,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('obj:V-N',6,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',25,24)	relation('comp_in:N-N',9,8)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',26,25)	relation('subj:V-N',19,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',25,22)	relation('obj:V-N',2,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,18)

ID	1575712-10
sentence	sigma F activity in the forespore regulates the proteolytic processing of sigma E within the mother cell compartment.
words	word(0,'sigma F',0,6)	word(1,'activity',8,15)	word(2,'in',17,18)	word(3,'the',20,22)	word(4,'forespore',24,32)	word(5,'regulates',34,42)	word(6,'the',44,46)	word(7,'proteolytic',48,58)	word(8,'processing',60,69)	word(9,'of',71,72)	word(10,'sigma E',74,80)	word(11,'within',82,87)	word(12,'the',89,91)	word(13,'mother',93,98)	word(14,'cell',100,103)	word(15,'compartment',105,115)
lemmas	lemma(0,'sigF')	lemma(1,'activity')	lemma(2,'in')	lemma(3,'the')	lemma(4,'forespore')	lemma(5,'regulate')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'proteolytic')	lemma(8,'processing')	lemma(9,'of')	lemma(10,'sigE')	lemma(11,'within')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'mother')	lemma(14,'cell')	lemma(15,'compartment')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_in:N-N',1,4)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',8,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',8,10)	relation('obj:V-N',5,8)	relation('subj:V-N',5,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('comp_within:V-N',5,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)

ID	1592811-2
sentence	We have now examined the physiological role of Sin in sporulation and found that this protein specifically represses three stage II sporulation genes (spoIIA, spoIIE, and spoIIG) but not the earlier-acting stage 0 sporulation genes.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'have',3,6)	word(2,'now',8,10)	word(3,'examined',12,19)	word(4,'the',21,23)	word(5,'physiological',25,37)	word(6,'role',39,42)	word(7,'of',44,45)	word(8,'Sin',47,49)	word(9,'in',51,52)	word(10,'sporulation',54,64)	word(11,'and',66,68)	word(12,'found',70,74)	word(13,'that',76,79)	word(14,'this',81,84)	word(15,'protein',86,92)	word(16,'specifically',94,105)	word(17,'represses',107,115)	word(18,'three',117,121)	word(19,'stage',123,127)	word(20,'II',129,130)	word(21,'sporulation',132,142)	word(22,'genes',144,148)	word(23,'spoIIA',151,156)	word(24,'spoIIE',159,164)	word(25,'and',167,169)	word(26,'spoIIG',171,176)	word(27,'but',179,181)	word(28,'not',183,185)	word(29,'the',187,189)	word(30,'earlier-acting',191,204)	word(31,'stage',206,210)	word(32,'0',212,212)	word(33,'sporulation',214,224)	word(34,'genes',226,230)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'have')	lemma(2,'now')	lemma(3,'examine')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'physiological')	lemma(6,'role')	lemma(7,'of')	lemma(8,'Sin')	lemma(9,'in')	lemma(10,'sporulation')	lemma(11,'and')	lemma(12,'find')	lemma(13,'that')	lemma(14,'this')	lemma(15,'protein')	lemma(16,'specifically')	lemma(17,'repress')	lemma(18,'three')	lemma(19,'stage')	lemma(20,'II')	lemma(21,'sporulation')	lemma(22,'gene')	lemma(23,'spoIIA')	lemma(24,'spoIIE')	lemma(25,'and')	lemma(26,'spoIIG')	lemma(27,'but')	lemma(28,'not')	lemma(29,'the')	lemma(30,'earlier-acting')	lemma(31,'stage')	lemma(32,'0')	lemma(33,'sporulation')	lemma(34,'gene')
syntactic_relations	relation('obj:V-N',17,22)	relation('mod:V-ADV',17,16)	relation('appos',23,24)	relation('subj:V-N',12,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',6,5)	relation('appos',23,26)	relation('comp_of:N-N',6,8)	relation('subj:V-N',17,15)	relation('comp_in:N-N',6,10)	relation('mod:V-ADV',3,2)	relation('appos',22,23)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',31,30)	relation('obj:V-N',3,6)

ID	1664536-6
sentence	Sin, another DNA-binding protein, represses the same genes, spoIIA, spoIIE and spoIIG, that are activated by Spo0A.
words	word(0,'Sin',0,2)	word(1,'another',5,11)	word(2,'DNA-binding',13,23)	word(3,'protein',25,31)	word(4,'represses',34,42)	word(5,'the',44,46)	word(6,'same',48,51)	word(7,'genes',53,57)	word(8,'spoIIA',60,65)	word(9,'spoIIE',68,73)	word(10,'and',75,77)	word(11,'spoIIG',79,84)	word(12,'that',87,90)	word(13,'are',92,94)	word(14,'activated',96,104)	word(15,'by',106,107)	word(16,'Spo0A',109,113)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Sin')	lemma(1,'another')	lemma(2,'DNA-binding')	lemma(3,'protein')	lemma(4,'repress')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'same')	lemma(7,'gene')	lemma(8,'spoIIA')	lemma(9,'spoIIE')	lemma(10,'and')	lemma(11,'spoIIG')	lemma(12,'that')	lemma(13,'be')	lemma(14,'activate')	lemma(15,'by')	lemma(16,'Spo0A')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',4,0)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',14,16)	relation('appos',7,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('appos',7,9)	relation('appos',0,3)	relation('obj:V-N',4,7)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',14,7)	relation('appos',7,8)

ID	1744042-11
sentence	This timing of expression and medium dependence were very similar to those for ctc, the only other recognized gene dependent on sigma B.
words	word(0,'This',0,3)	word(1,'timing',5,10)	word(2,'of',12,13)	word(3,'expression',15,24)	word(4,'and',26,28)	word(5,'medium',30,35)	word(6,'dependence',37,46)	word(7,'were',48,51)	word(8,'very',53,56)	word(9,'similar',58,64)	word(10,'to',66,67)	word(11,'those',69,73)	word(12,'for',75,77)	word(13,'ctc',79,81)	word(14,'the',84,86)	word(15,'only',88,91)	word(16,'other',93,97)	word(17,'recognized',99,108)	word(18,'gene',110,113)	word(19,'dependent',115,123)	word(20,'on',125,126)	word(21,'sigma B',128,134)
lemmas	lemma(0,'this')	lemma(1,'timing')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'expression')	lemma(4,'and')	lemma(5,'medium')	lemma(6,'dependence')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'very')	lemma(9,'similar')	lemma(10,'to')	lemma(11,'those')	lemma(12,'for')	lemma(13,'ctc')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'only')	lemma(16,'other')	lemma(17,'recognize')	lemma(18,'gene')	lemma(19,'dependent')	lemma(20,'on')	lemma(21,'sigB')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',18,19)	relation('mod:ADJ-ADV',9,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,3)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',19,21)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',1,9)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',6,9)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',18,17)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',9,11)	relation('comp_for:N-N',11,13)	relation('appos',13,18)

ID	1784821-1
sentence	Two RNA polymerase sigma factors, sigma F and sigma E, are produced during the first two hours of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis.
words	word(0,'Two',0,2)	word(1,'RNA',4,6)	word(2,'polymerase',8,17)	word(3,'sigma',19,23)	word(4,'factors',25,31)	word(5,'sigma F',34,40)	word(6,'and',42,44)	word(7,'sigma E',46,52)	word(8,'are',55,57)	word(9,'produced',59,66)	word(10,'during',68,73)	word(11,'the',75,77)	word(12,'first',79,83)	word(13,'two',85,87)	word(14,'hours',89,93)	word(15,'of',95,96)	word(16,'endospore',98,106)	word(17,'formation',108,116)	word(18,'in',118,119)	word(19,'Bacillus subtilis',121,137)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Two')	lemma(1,'RNA')	lemma(2,'polymerase')	lemma(3,'sigma')	lemma(4,'factor')	lemma(5,'sigF')	lemma(6,'and')	lemma(7,'sigE')	lemma(8,'be')	lemma(9,'produce')	lemma(10,'during')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'first')	lemma(13,'two')	lemma(14,'hour')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'endospore')	lemma(17,'formation')	lemma(18,'in')	lemma(19,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,17)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',17,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,2)	relation('comp_in:N-N',17,19)	relation('appos',4,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,4)	relation('appos',4,7)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',9,14)

ID	1898930-8
sentence	These studies indicate that spo0H is transcribed by the major vegetative RNA polymerase, E sigma A.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'studies',6,12)	word(2,'indicate',14,21)	word(3,'that',23,26)	word(4,'spo0H',28,32)	word(5,'is',34,35)	word(6,'transcribed',37,47)	word(7,'by',49,50)	word(8,'the',52,54)	word(9,'major',56,60)	word(10,'vegetative',62,71)	word(11,'RNA',73,75)	word(12,'polymerase',77,86)	word(13,'E sigma A',89,97)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'study')	lemma(2,'indicate')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'spo0H')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'transcribe')	lemma(7,'by')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'major')	lemma(10,'vegetative')	lemma(11,'RNA')	lemma(12,'polymerase')	lemma(13,'E sigma A')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,9)	relation('appos',12,13)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,4)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,10)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',6,12)

ID	1898930-9
sentence	spo0H RNA and sigma H levels during growth are not identical to each other or to the pattern of expression of spoVG, a gene transcribed by E sigma H.
words	word(0,'spo0H',0,4)	word(1,'RNA',6,8)	word(2,'and',10,12)	word(3,'sigma H',14,20)	word(4,'levels',22,27)	word(5,'during',29,34)	word(6,'growth',36,41)	word(7,'are',43,45)	word(8,'not',47,49)	word(9,'identical',51,59)	word(10,'to',61,62)	word(11,'each',64,67)	word(12,'other',69,73)	word(13,'or',75,76)	word(14,'to',78,79)	word(15,'the',81,83)	word(16,'pattern',85,91)	word(17,'of',93,94)	word(18,'expression',96,105)	word(19,'of',107,108)	word(20,'spoVG',110,114)	word(21,'a',117,117)	word(22,'gene',119,122)	word(23,'transcribed',124,134)	word(24,'by',136,137)	word(25,'E sigma H',139,147)
lemmas	lemma(0,'spo0H')	lemma(1,'RNA')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'sigH')	lemma(4,'level')	lemma(5,'during')	lemma(6,'growth')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'not')	lemma(9,'identical')	lemma(10,'to')	lemma(11,'each')	lemma(12,'other')	lemma(13,'or')	lemma(14,'to')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'pattern')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'expression')	lemma(19,'of')	lemma(20,'spoVG')	lemma(21,'a')	lemma(22,'gene')	lemma(23,'transcribe')	lemma(24,'by')	lemma(25,'E sigma H')
syntactic_relations	relation('neg',9,8)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,9)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',23,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('appos',20,22)	relation('comp_of:N-N',18,20)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',23,25)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',9,16)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',9,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,1)	relation('comp_during:N-N',4,6)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,18)

ID	1900494-5
sentence	We also show that spoIVB transcription is partially dependent on the action of the mother cell regulatory gene spoIIID, a finding that suggests that the transcription of certain forespore-expressed genes is influenced by events in the mother cell.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'also',3,6)	word(2,'show',8,11)	word(3,'that',13,16)	word(4,'spoIVB',18,23)	word(5,'transcription',25,37)	word(6,'is',39,40)	word(7,'partially',42,50)	word(8,'dependent',52,60)	word(9,'on',62,63)	word(10,'the',65,67)	word(11,'action',69,74)	word(12,'of',76,77)	word(13,'the',79,81)	word(14,'mother',83,88)	word(15,'cell',90,93)	word(16,'regulatory',95,104)	word(17,'gene',106,109)	word(18,'spoIIID',111,117)	word(19,'a',120,120)	word(20,'finding',122,128)	word(21,'that',130,133)	word(22,'suggests',135,142)	word(23,'that',144,147)	word(24,'the',149,151)	word(25,'transcription',153,165)	word(26,'of',167,168)	word(27,'certain',170,176)	word(28,'forespore-expressed',178,196)	word(29,'genes',198,202)	word(30,'is',204,205)	word(31,'influenced',207,216)	word(32,'by',218,219)	word(33,'events',221,226)	word(34,'in',228,229)	word(35,'the',231,233)	word(36,'mother',235,240)	word(37,'cell',242,245)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'also')	lemma(2,'show')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'spoIVB')	lemma(5,'transcription')	lemma(6,'be')	lemma(7,'partially')	lemma(8,'dependent')	lemma(9,'on')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'action')	lemma(12,'of')	lemma(13,'the')	lemma(14,'mother')	lemma(15,'cell')	lemma(16,'regulative')	lemma(17,'gene')	lemma(18,'spoIIID')	lemma(19,'a')	lemma(20,'finding')	lemma(21,'that')	lemma(22,'suggest')	lemma(23,'that')	lemma(24,'the')	lemma(25,'transcription')	lemma(26,'of')	lemma(27,'certain')	lemma(28,'forespore-expressed')	lemma(29,'gene')	lemma(30,'be')	lemma(31,'influence')	lemma(32,'by')	lemma(33,'event')	lemma(34,'in')	lemma(35,'the')	lemma(36,'mother')	lemma(37,'cell')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',25,29)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',5,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',37,36)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('comp_in:N-N',33,37)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',31,25)	relation('subj:V-N',2,0)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',29,27)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('mod:ADJ-ADV',8,7)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,1)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',31,33)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',29,28)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',8,11)	relation('comp_of:N-N',11,18)	relation('subj:V-N',22,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',17,16)

ID	1900507-1
sentence	The sspB and sspE genes code for major small, acid-soluble proteins of Bacillus subtilis spores and are transcribed during sporulation by RNA polymerase containing sigma G.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'sspB',4,7)	word(2,'and',9,11)	word(3,'sspE',13,16)	word(4,'genes',18,22)	word(5,'code',24,27)	word(6,'for',29,31)	word(7,'major',33,37)	word(8,'small',39,43)	word(9,'acid-soluble',46,57)	word(10,'proteins',59,66)	word(11,'of',68,69)	word(12,'Bacillus subtilis',71,87)	word(13,'spores',89,94)	word(14,'and',96,98)	word(15,'are',100,102)	word(16,'transcribed',104,114)	word(17,'during',116,121)	word(18,'sporulation',123,133)	word(19,'by',135,136)	word(20,'RNA',138,140)	word(21,'polymerase',142,151)	word(22,'containing',153,162)	word(23,'sigma G',164,170)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'sspB')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'sspE')	lemma(4,'gene')	lemma(5,'code')	lemma(6,'for')	lemma(7,'major')	lemma(8,'small')	lemma(9,'acid-soluble')	lemma(10,'protein')	lemma(11,'of')	lemma(12,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(13,'swarm')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'be')	lemma(16,'transcribe')	lemma(17,'during')	lemma(18,'sporulation')	lemma(19,'by')	lemma(20,'RNA')	lemma(21,'polymerase')	lemma(22,'contain')	lemma(23,'sigG')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',16,21)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,8)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',16,4)	relation('comp_for:V-N',5,10)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',16,18)	relation('subj:V-N',5,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)	relation('subj:V-N',22,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,1)	relation('obj:V-N',22,23)

ID	1902213-7
sentence	These data suggest that synthesis of sigma G is dependent neither on transcription from the spoIIG promoter nor on sigma G itself but can be due to another transcription factor.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'data',6,9)	word(2,'suggest',11,17)	word(3,'that',19,22)	word(4,'synthesis',24,32)	word(5,'of',34,35)	word(6,'sigma G',37,43)	word(7,'is',45,46)	word(8,'dependent',48,56)	word(9,'neither',58,64)	word(10,'on',66,67)	word(11,'transcription',69,81)	word(12,'from',83,86)	word(13,'the',88,90)	word(14,'spoIIG',92,97)	word(15,'promoter',99,106)	word(16,'nor',108,110)	word(17,'on',112,113)	word(18,'sigma G',115,121)	word(19,'itself',123,128)	word(20,'but',130,132)	word(21,'can',134,136)	word(22,'be',138,139)	word(23,'due',141,143)	word(24,'to',145,146)	word(25,'another',148,154)	word(26,'transcription',156,168)	word(27,'factor',170,175)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'datum')	lemma(2,'suggest')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'synthesis')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'sigG')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'dependent')	lemma(9,'neither')	lemma(10,'on')	lemma(11,'transcription')	lemma(12,'from')	lemma(13,'the')	lemma(14,'spoIIG')	lemma(15,'promoter')	lemma(16,'nor')	lemma(17,'on')	lemma(18,'sigG')	lemma(19,'itself')	lemma(20,'but')	lemma(21,'can')	lemma(22,'be')	lemma(23,'due')	lemma(24,'to')	lemma(25,'another')	lemma(26,'transcription')	lemma(27,'factor')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',8,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',27,26)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',23,27)	relation('comp_from:N-N',11,15)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',8,11)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,23)	relation('comp_of:N-N',4,6)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,8)

ID	1905664-3
sentence	We found that sigma H-RNA polymerase transcribes spoIIA accurately in vitro and propose that sigma H directs transcription of spoIIA during sporulation.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'found',3,7)	word(2,'that',9,12)	word(3,'sigma H',14,20)	word(4,'RNA',22,24)	word(5,'polymerase',26,35)	word(6,'transcribes',37,47)	word(7,'spoIIA',49,54)	word(8,'accurately',56,65)	word(9,'in',67,68)	word(10,'vitro',70,74)	word(11,'and',76,78)	word(12,'propose',80,86)	word(13,'that',88,91)	word(14,'sigma H',93,99)	word(15,'directs',101,107)	word(16,'transcription',109,121)	word(17,'of',123,124)	word(18,'spoIIA',126,131)	word(19,'during',133,138)	word(20,'sporulation',140,150)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'find')	lemma(2,'that')	lemma(3,'sigH')	lemma(4,'RNA')	lemma(5,'polymerase')	lemma(6,'transcribe')	lemma(7,'spoIIA')	lemma(8,'accurately')	lemma(9,'in')	lemma(10,'vitro')	lemma(11,'and')	lemma(12,'propose')	lemma(13,'that')	lemma(14,'sigH')	lemma(15,'direct')	lemma(16,'transcription')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'spoIIA')	lemma(19,'during')	lemma(20,'sporulation')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('comp_in:V-N',6,10)	relation('subj:V-N',6,5)	relation('obj:V-N',6,7)	relation('comp_during:N-N',16,20)	relation('subj:V-N',15,14)	relation('subj:V-N',1,0)	relation('subj:V-N',12,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,3)	relation('obj:V-N',15,16)	relation('mod:V-ADV',6,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,18)

ID	1906867-3
sentence	These results indicate that gerD is another member of the sigma G regulon, which includes a number of genes expressed only in the forespore compartment of sporulating cells of B. subtilis.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'results',6,12)	word(2,'indicate',14,21)	word(3,'that',23,26)	word(4,'gerD',28,31)	word(5,'is',33,34)	word(6,'another',36,42)	word(7,'member',44,49)	word(8,'of',51,52)	word(9,'the',54,56)	word(10,'sigma G',58,64)	word(11,'regulon',66,72)	word(12,'which',75,79)	word(13,'includes',81,88)	word(14,'a',90,90)	word(15,'number',92,97)	word(16,'of',99,100)	word(17,'genes',102,106)	word(18,'expressed',108,116)	word(19,'only',118,121)	word(20,'in',123,124)	word(21,'the',126,128)	word(22,'forespore',130,138)	word(23,'compartment',140,150)	word(24,'of',152,153)	word(25,'sporulating',155,165)	word(26,'cells',167,171)	word(27,'of',173,174)	word(28,'B. subtilis',176,186)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'result')	lemma(2,'indicate')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'gerD')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'another')	lemma(7,'member')	lemma(8,'of')	lemma(9,'the')	lemma(10,'sigG')	lemma(11,'regulon')	lemma(12,'which')	lemma(13,'include')	lemma(14,'a')	lemma(15,'number')	lemma(16,'of')	lemma(17,'gene')	lemma(18,'express')	lemma(19,'only')	lemma(20,'in')	lemma(21,'the')	lemma(22,'forespore')	lemma(23,'compartment')	lemma(24,'of')	lemma(25,'sporulate')	lemma(26,'cell')	lemma(27,'of')	lemma(28,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',4,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',7,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,10)	relation('subj:V-N',13,11)	relation('obj:V-N',13,15)	relation('comp_of:N-N',15,17)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',18,17)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',18,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',23,22)	relation('comp_of:N-N',23,26)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',26,25)	relation('comp_of:N-N',26,28)

ID	1906926-6
sentence	There is also substantial homology between the deduced products of tagB in the tagABC operon and tagF in the tagDEF operon.
words	word(0,'There',0,4)	word(1,'is',6,7)	word(2,'also',9,12)	word(3,'substantial',14,24)	word(4,'homology',26,33)	word(5,'between',35,41)	word(6,'the',43,45)	word(7,'deduced',47,53)	word(8,'products',55,62)	word(9,'of',64,65)	word(10,'tagB',67,70)	word(11,'in',72,73)	word(12,'the',75,77)	word(13,'tagABC',79,84)	word(14,'operon',86,91)	word(15,'and',93,95)	word(16,'tagF',97,100)	word(17,'in',102,103)	word(18,'the',105,107)	word(19,'tagDEF',109,114)	word(20,'operon',116,121)
lemmas	lemma(0,'There')	lemma(1,'be')	lemma(2,'also')	lemma(3,'substantial')	lemma(4,'homology')	lemma(5,'between')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'deduce')	lemma(8,'product')	lemma(9,'of')	lemma(10,'tagB')	lemma(11,'in')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'tagABC')	lemma(14,'operon')	lemma(15,'and')	lemma(16,'tagF')	lemma(17,'in')	lemma(18,'the')	lemma(19,'tagDEF')	lemma(20,'operon')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',8,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',8,16)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',4,3)	relation('comp_in:N-N',16,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',20,19)	relation('comp_of:N-N',8,10)	relation('comp_in:N-N',10,14)	relation('comp_between:N-N',4,8)

ID	1938874-4
sentence	However, the observations that sigma F directs transcription of the structural gene for sigma G and that sigma F activity can be modified by the product of a gene, spoIIAB, has led us to investigate the role of spoIIAB during sporulation.
words	word(0,'However',0,6)	word(1,'the',9,11)	word(2,'observations',13,24)	word(3,'that',26,29)	word(4,'sigma F',31,37)	word(5,'directs',39,45)	word(6,'transcription',47,59)	word(7,'of',61,62)	word(8,'the',64,66)	word(9,'structural',68,77)	word(10,'gene',79,82)	word(11,'for',84,86)	word(12,'sigma G',88,94)	word(13,'and',96,98)	word(14,'that',100,103)	word(15,'sigma F',105,111)	word(16,'activity',113,120)	word(17,'can',122,124)	word(18,'be',126,127)	word(19,'modified',129,136)	word(20,'by',138,139)	word(21,'the',141,143)	word(22,'product',145,151)	word(23,'of',153,154)	word(24,'a',156,156)	word(25,'gene',158,161)	word(26,'spoIIAB',164,170)	word(27,'has',173,175)	word(28,'led',177,179)	word(29,'us',181,182)	word(30,'to',184,185)	word(31,'investigate',187,197)	word(32,'the',199,201)	word(33,'role',203,206)	word(34,'of',208,209)	word(35,'spoIIAB',211,217)	word(36,'during',219,224)	word(37,'sporulation',226,236)
lemmas	lemma(0,'however')	lemma(1,'the')	lemma(2,'observation')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'sigF')	lemma(5,'direct')	lemma(6,'transcription')	lemma(7,'of')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'structural')	lemma(10,'gene')	lemma(11,'for')	lemma(12,'sigG')	lemma(13,'and')	lemma(14,'that')	lemma(15,'sigF')	lemma(16,'activity')	lemma(17,'can')	lemma(18,'be')	lemma(19,'modify')	lemma(20,'by')	lemma(21,'the')	lemma(22,'product')	lemma(23,'of')	lemma(24,'a')	lemma(25,'gene')	lemma(26,'spoIIAB')	lemma(27,'have')	lemma(28,'lead')	lemma(29,'us')	lemma(30,'to')	lemma(31,'investigate')	lemma(32,'the')	lemma(33,'role')	lemma(34,'of')	lemma(35,'spoIIAB')	lemma(36,'during')	lemma(37,'sporulation')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_during:N-N',33,37)	relation('obj:V-N',31,33)	relation('mod:V-ADV',28,0)	relation('subj:V-N',5,4)	relation('obj:V-N',5,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)	relation('comp_of:N-N',33,35)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',19,16)	relation('comp_of:N-N',22,25)	relation('comp_for:N-N',6,12)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',19,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('obj:V-N',28,29)	relation('appos',22,26)	relation('comp_of:N-N',6,10)	relation('subj:V-N',28,2)	relation('comp_to:V-V',28,31)

ID	1938874-8
sentence	These observations confirm that spoIIAB is essential for sporulation and are consistent with models in which the product of spoIIAB plays a role in regulating the timing and/or compartment specificity of sigma F- and sigma G-directed transcription.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'observations',6,17)	word(2,'confirm',19,25)	word(3,'that',27,30)	word(4,'spoIIAB',32,38)	word(5,'is',40,41)	word(6,'essential',43,51)	word(7,'for',53,55)	word(8,'sporulation',57,67)	word(9,'and',69,71)	word(10,'are',73,75)	word(11,'consistent',77,86)	word(12,'with',88,91)	word(13,'models',93,98)	word(14,'in',100,101)	word(15,'which',103,107)	word(16,'the',109,111)	word(17,'product',113,119)	word(18,'of',121,122)	word(19,'spoIIAB',124,130)	word(20,'plays',132,136)	word(21,'a',138,138)	word(22,'role',140,143)	word(23,'in',145,146)	word(24,'regulating',148,157)	word(25,'the',159,161)	word(26,'timing',163,168)	word(27,'and/or',170,175)	word(28,'compartment',177,187)	word(29,'specificity',189,199)	word(30,'of',201,202)	word(31,'sigma F',204,210)	word(32,'and',213,215)	word(33,'sigma G',217,223)	word(34,'directed',225,232)	word(35,'transcription',234,246)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'observation')	lemma(2,'confirm')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'spoIIAB')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'essential')	lemma(7,'for')	lemma(8,'sporulation')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'be')	lemma(11,'consistent')	lemma(12,'with')	lemma(13,'model')	lemma(14,'in')	lemma(15,'which')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'product')	lemma(18,'of')	lemma(19,'spoIIAB')	lemma(20,'play')	lemma(21,'a')	lemma(22,'role')	lemma(23,'in')	lemma(24,'regulate')	lemma(25,'the')	lemma(26,'timing')	lemma(27,'and/or')	lemma(28,'compartment')	lemma(29,'specificity')	lemma(30,'of')	lemma(31,'sigF')	lemma(32,'and')	lemma(33,'sigG')	lemma(34,'direct')	lemma(35,'transcription')
syntactic_relations	relation('obj:V-N',20,22)	relation('comp_with:ADJ-N',11,13)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',29,28)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',34,31)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',34,33)	relation('obj:V-N',24,26)	relation('comp_of:N-N',29,33)	relation('comp_for:ADJ-N',6,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',17,19)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',34,35)	relation('comp_of:N-N',29,31)	relation('comp_in:N-V',22,24)	relation('subj:V-N',20,17)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',1,11)	relation('comp_in:V-N',20,13)	relation('obj:V-N',24,29)

ID	2111808-2
sentence	One such factor, sigma D (sigma 28), is expressed during vegetative growth and has been implicated in the transcription of a regulon of genes expressed during exponential growth and the early stationary phase.
words	word(0,'One',0,2)	word(1,'such',4,7)	word(2,'factor',9,14)	word(3,'sigma D',17,23)	word(4,'sigma 28',26,33)	word(5,'is',37,38)	word(6,'expressed',40,48)	word(7,'during',50,55)	word(8,'vegetative',57,66)	word(9,'growth',68,73)	word(10,'and',75,77)	word(11,'has',79,81)	word(12,'been',83,86)	word(13,'implicated',88,97)	word(14,'in',99,100)	word(15,'the',102,104)	word(16,'transcription',106,118)	word(17,'of',120,121)	word(18,'a',123,123)	word(19,'regulon',125,131)	word(20,'of',133,134)	word(21,'genes',136,140)	word(22,'expressed',142,150)	word(23,'during',152,157)	word(24,'exponential',159,169)	word(25,'growth',171,176)	word(26,'and',178,180)	word(27,'the',182,184)	word(28,'early',186,190)	word(29,'stationary',192,201)	word(30,'phase',203,207)
lemmas	lemma(0,'One')	lemma(1,'such')	lemma(2,'factor')	lemma(3,'sigD')	lemma(4,'sigF')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'express')	lemma(7,'during')	lemma(8,'vegetative')	lemma(9,'growth')	lemma(10,'and')	lemma(11,'have')	lemma(12,'be')	lemma(13,'implicate')	lemma(14,'in')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'transcription')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'a')	lemma(19,'regulon')	lemma(20,'of')	lemma(21,'gene')	lemma(22,'express')	lemma(23,'during')	lemma(24,'exponential')	lemma(25,'growth')	lemma(26,'and')	lemma(27,'the')	lemma(28,'early')	lemma(29,'stationary')	lemma(30,'phase')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',25,24)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',22,25)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',9,8)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',13,2)	relation('comp_of:N-N',19,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,28)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,2)	relation('appos',3,4)	relation('appos',2,3)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,19)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',22,21)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',22,30)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',6,9)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,29)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',13,16)

ID	2163341-1
sentence	The structural gene (sigK) for the mother-cell RNA polymerase sigma-factor sigma K in Bacillus subtilis is a composite of two truncated genes, named spoIVCB and spoIIIC, which are brought together by site-specific recombination during sporulation.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'structural',4,13)	word(2,'gene',15,18)	word(3,'sigK',21,24)	word(4,'for',27,29)	word(5,'the',31,33)	word(6,'mother-cell',35,45)	word(7,'RNA',47,49)	word(8,'polymerase',51,60)	word(9,'sigma-factor',62,73)	word(10,'sigma K',75,81)	word(11,'in',83,84)	word(12,'Bacillus subtilis',86,102)	word(13,'is',104,105)	word(14,'a',107,107)	word(15,'composite',109,117)	word(16,'of',119,120)	word(17,'two',122,124)	word(18,'truncated',126,134)	word(19,'genes',136,140)	word(20,'named',143,147)	word(21,'spoIVCB',149,155)	word(22,'and',157,159)	word(23,'spoIIIC',161,167)	word(24,'which',170,174)	word(25,'are',176,178)	word(26,'brought',180,186)	word(27,'together',188,195)	word(28,'by',197,198)	word(29,'site-specific',200,212)	word(30,'recombination',214,226)	word(31,'during',228,233)	word(32,'sporulation',235,245)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'structural')	lemma(2,'gene')	lemma(3,'sigK')	lemma(4,'for')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'mother-cell')	lemma(7,'RNA')	lemma(8,'polymerase')	lemma(9,'sigma-factor')	lemma(10,'sigK')	lemma(11,'in')	lemma(12,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(13,'be')	lemma(14,'a')	lemma(15,'composite')	lemma(16,'of')	lemma(17,'two')	lemma(18,'truncated')	lemma(19,'gene')	lemma(20,'name')	lemma(21,'spoIVCB')	lemma(22,'and')	lemma(23,'spoIIIC')	lemma(24,'which')	lemma(25,'be')	lemma(26,'bring')	lemma(27,'together')	lemma(28,'by')	lemma(29,'site-specific')	lemma(30,'recombination')	lemma(31,'during')	lemma(32,'sporulation')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',26,30)	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',26,27)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('comp_for:N-N',2,10)	relation('comp_in:N-N',10,12)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,29)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',2,15)	relation('comp_during:V_PASS-N',26,32)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,6)	relation('appos',2,3)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',19,18)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',20,19)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',26,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',15,19)	relation('obj:V_PASS-N',20,21)	relation('obj:V_PASS-N',20,23)

ID	2468649-2
sentence	Transcription of these genes is mediated by RNA polymerase containing sigma G (E sigma G), the product of the sigG gene, which is itself expressed at stage III in the developing forespore.
words	word(0,'Transcription',0,12)	word(1,'of',14,15)	word(2,'these',17,21)	word(3,'genes',23,27)	word(4,'is',29,30)	word(5,'mediated',32,39)	word(6,'by',41,42)	word(7,'RNA',44,46)	word(8,'polymerase',48,57)	word(9,'containing',59,68)	word(10,'sigma G',70,76)	word(11,'E sigma G',79,87)	word(12,'the',91,93)	word(13,'product',95,101)	word(14,'of',103,104)	word(15,'the',106,108)	word(16,'sigG',110,113)	word(17,'gene',115,118)	word(18,'which',121,125)	word(19,'is',127,128)	word(20,'itself',130,135)	word(21,'expressed',137,145)	word(22,'at',147,148)	word(23,'stage',150,154)	word(24,'III',156,158)	word(25,'in',160,161)	word(26,'the',163,165)	word(27,'developing',167,176)	word(28,'forespore',178,186)
lemmas	lemma(0,'transcription')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'these')	lemma(3,'gene')	lemma(4,'be')	lemma(5,'mediate')	lemma(6,'by')	lemma(7,'RNA')	lemma(8,'polymerase')	lemma(9,'contain')	lemma(10,'sigG')	lemma(11,'E sigma G')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'product')	lemma(14,'of')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'sigG')	lemma(17,'gene')	lemma(18,'which')	lemma(19,'be')	lemma(20,'itself')	lemma(21,'express')	lemma(22,'at')	lemma(23,'stage')	lemma(24,'III')	lemma(25,'in')	lemma(26,'the')	lemma(27,'develop')	lemma(28,'forespore')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',21,28)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,17)	relation('obj:V-N',9,10)	relation('subj:V-N',9,8)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',5,8)	relation('appos',10,13)	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',21,20)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,3)	relation('comp_of:N-N',13,17)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',5,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('appos',10,11)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',28,27)	relation('comp_at:V_PASS-N',21,23)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',23,24)

ID	2492118-2
sentence	A 27-kilodalton RNA polymerase sigma factor called sigma K (or sigma 27) has been found that causes weak transcription of spoIVCB and strong transcription of cotD.
words	word(0,'A',0,0)	word(1,'27-kilodalton',2,14)	word(2,'RNA',16,18)	word(3,'polymerase',20,29)	word(4,'sigma',31,35)	word(5,'factor',37,42)	word(6,'called',44,49)	word(7,'sigma K',51,57)	word(8,'or',60,61)	word(9,'sigma 27',63,70)	word(10,'has',73,75)	word(11,'been',77,80)	word(12,'found',82,86)	word(13,'that',88,91)	word(14,'causes',93,98)	word(15,'weak',100,103)	word(16,'transcription',105,117)	word(17,'of',119,120)	word(18,'spoIVCB',122,128)	word(19,'and',130,132)	word(20,'strong',134,139)	word(21,'transcription',141,153)	word(22,'of',155,156)	word(23,'cotD',158,161)
lemmas	lemma(0,'a')	lemma(1,'27-kilodalton')	lemma(2,'RNA')	lemma(3,'polymerase')	lemma(4,'sigma')	lemma(5,'factor')	lemma(6,'call')	lemma(7,'sigK')	lemma(8,'or')	lemma(9,'sigma 27')	lemma(10,'have')	lemma(11,'be')	lemma(12,'find')	lemma(13,'that')	lemma(14,'cause')	lemma(15,'weak')	lemma(16,'transcription')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'spoIVCB')	lemma(19,'and')	lemma(20,'strong')	lemma(21,'transcription')	lemma(22,'of')	lemma(23,'cotD')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('appos',7,9)	relation('obj:V-N',14,21)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,5)	relation('subj:V-N',12,5)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('comp_of:N-N',21,23)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,15)	relation('obj:V-N',14,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,3)	relation('obj:V_PASS-N',6,7)	relation('subj:V-N',14,5)

ID	2492118-3
sentence	A 14-kD protein was also discovered that changes the specificity of sigma K-containing RNA polymerase, greatly stimulating spoIVCB transcription and markedly repressing cotD transcription.
words	word(0,'A',0,0)	word(1,'14-kD',2,6)	word(2,'protein',8,14)	word(3,'was',16,18)	word(4,'also',20,23)	word(5,'discovered',25,34)	word(6,'that',36,39)	word(7,'changes',41,47)	word(8,'the',49,51)	word(9,'specificity',53,63)	word(10,'of',65,66)	word(11,'sigma K',68,74)	word(12,'containing',76,85)	word(13,'RNA',87,89)	word(14,'polymerase',91,100)	word(15,'greatly',103,109)	word(16,'stimulating',111,121)	word(17,'spoIVCB',123,129)	word(18,'transcription',131,143)	word(19,'and',145,147)	word(20,'markedly',149,156)	word(21,'repressing',158,167)	word(22,'cotD',169,172)	word(23,'transcription',174,186)
lemmas	lemma(0,'a')	lemma(1,'14-kD')	lemma(2,'protein')	lemma(3,'be')	lemma(4,'also')	lemma(5,'discover')	lemma(6,'that')	lemma(7,'change')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'specificity')	lemma(10,'of')	lemma(11,'sigK')	lemma(12,'contain')	lemma(13,'RNA')	lemma(14,'polymerase')	lemma(15,'greatly')	lemma(16,'stimulate')	lemma(17,'spoIVCB')	lemma(18,'transcription')	lemma(19,'and')	lemma(20,'markedly')	lemma(21,'repress')	lemma(22,'cotD')	lemma(23,'transcription')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',16,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',23,22)	relation('mod:V-ADV',16,15)	relation('comp_of:N-N',9,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('obj:V-N',12,14)	relation('obj:V-N',7,9)	relation('obj:V-N',21,23)	relation('mod:V-ADV',3,4)	relation('mod:V-ADV',21,20)	relation('subj:V-N',12,11)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',5,2)	relation('obj:V-N',16,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('subj:V-N',21,11)	relation('subj:V-N',7,2)

ID	2496113-1
sentence	In vitro studies demonstrated that the Bacillus subtilis subtilisin gene (aprE) could be transcribed by RNA polymerase holoenzyme reconstituted from core and sigma A factor obtained from vegetative cells.
words	word(0,'In',0,1)	word(1,'vitro',3,7)	word(2,'studies',9,15)	word(3,'demonstrated',17,28)	word(4,'that',30,33)	word(5,'the',35,37)	word(6,'Bacillus subtilis',39,55)	word(7,'subtilisin',57,66)	word(8,'gene',68,71)	word(9,'aprE',74,77)	word(10,'could',80,84)	word(11,'be',86,87)	word(12,'transcribed',89,99)	word(13,'by',101,102)	word(14,'RNA',104,106)	word(15,'polymerase',108,117)	word(16,'holoenzyme',119,128)	word(17,'reconstituted',130,142)	word(18,'from',144,147)	word(19,'core',149,152)	word(20,'and',154,156)	word(21,'sigma A',158,164)	word(22,'factor',166,171)	word(23,'obtained',173,180)	word(24,'from',182,185)	word(25,'vegetative',187,196)	word(26,'cells',198,202)
lemmas	lemma(0,'in')	lemma(1,'vitro')	lemma(2,'study')	lemma(3,'demonstrate')	lemma(4,'that')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(7,'subtilisin')	lemma(8,'gene')	lemma(9,'aprE')	lemma(10,'could')	lemma(11,'be')	lemma(12,'transcribe')	lemma(13,'by')	lemma(14,'RNA')	lemma(15,'polymerase')	lemma(16,'holoenzyme')	lemma(17,'reconstitute')	lemma(18,'from')	lemma(19,'core')	lemma(20,'and')	lemma(21,'sigA')	lemma(22,'factor')	lemma(23,'obtain')	lemma(24,'from')	lemma(25,'vegetative')	lemma(26,'cell')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',12,16)	relation('comp_in:N-N',2,1)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',23,19)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',17,22)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',17,19)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',26,25)	relation('appos',8,9)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('subj:V-N',3,2)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',17,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,21)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',12,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',23,22)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',23,26)

ID	2500529-2
sentence	The product of regulatory gene spo0H is an RNA polymerase sigma factor called sigma H, which directs transcription of a sporulation gene known as spoVG.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'product',4,10)	word(2,'of',12,13)	word(3,'regulatory',15,24)	word(4,'gene',26,29)	word(5,'spo0H',31,35)	word(6,'is',37,38)	word(7,'an',40,41)	word(8,'RNA',43,45)	word(9,'polymerase',47,56)	word(10,'sigma',58,62)	word(11,'factor',64,69)	word(12,'called',71,76)	word(13,'sigma H',78,84)	word(14,'which',87,91)	word(15,'directs',93,99)	word(16,'transcription',101,113)	word(17,'of',115,116)	word(18,'a',118,118)	word(19,'sporulation',120,130)	word(20,'gene',132,135)	word(21,'known',137,141)	word(22,'as',143,144)	word(23,'spoVG',146,150)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'product')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'regulative')	lemma(4,'gene')	lemma(5,'spo0H')	lemma(6,'be')	lemma(7,'an')	lemma(8,'RNA')	lemma(9,'polymerase')	lemma(10,'sigma')	lemma(11,'factor')	lemma(12,'call')	lemma(13,'sigH')	lemma(14,'which')	lemma(15,'direct')	lemma(16,'transcription')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'a')	lemma(19,'sporulation')	lemma(20,'gene')	lemma(21,'know')	lemma(22,'as')	lemma(23,'spoVG')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',20,19)	relation('obj:V-N',15,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,9)	relation('subj:V-N',15,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',4,3)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,11)	relation('comp_as:V_PASS-N',21,23)	relation('obj:V_PASS-N',12,13)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,5)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,20)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',12,11)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,20)

ID	2512576-6
sentence	These results support a model in which a form of RNA polymerase containing sigma A is utilized in an unusual manner to activate the transcription of the spoIIG operon well after the onset of endospore formation.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'results',6,12)	word(2,'support',14,20)	word(3,'a',22,22)	word(4,'model',24,28)	word(5,'in',30,31)	word(6,'which',33,37)	word(7,'a',39,39)	word(8,'form',41,44)	word(9,'of',46,47)	word(10,'RNA',49,51)	word(11,'polymerase',53,62)	word(12,'containing',64,73)	word(13,'sigma A',75,81)	word(14,'is',83,84)	word(15,'utilized',86,93)	word(16,'in',95,96)	word(17,'an',98,99)	word(18,'unusual',101,107)	word(19,'manner',109,114)	word(20,'to',116,117)	word(21,'activate',119,126)	word(22,'the',128,130)	word(23,'transcription',132,144)	word(24,'of',146,147)	word(25,'the',149,151)	word(26,'spoIIG',153,158)	word(27,'operon',160,165)	word(28,'well',167,170)	word(29,'after',172,176)	word(30,'the',178,180)	word(31,'onset',182,186)	word(32,'of',188,189)	word(33,'endospore',191,199)	word(34,'formation',201,209)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'result')	lemma(2,'support')	lemma(3,'a')	lemma(4,'model')	lemma(5,'in')	lemma(6,'which')	lemma(7,'a')	lemma(8,'form')	lemma(9,'of')	lemma(10,'RNA')	lemma(11,'polymerase')	lemma(12,'contain')	lemma(13,'sigA')	lemma(14,'be')	lemma(15,'utilize')	lemma(16,'in')	lemma(17,'an')	lemma(18,'unusual')	lemma(19,'manner')	lemma(20,'to')	lemma(21,'activate')	lemma(22,'the')	lemma(23,'transcription')	lemma(24,'of')	lemma(25,'the')	lemma(26,'spoIIG')	lemma(27,'operon')	lemma(28,'well')	lemma(29,'after')	lemma(30,'the')	lemma(31,'onset')	lemma(32,'of')	lemma(33,'endospore')	lemma(34,'formation')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,10)	relation('comp_of:N-N',8,11)	relation('comp_to:V_PASS-V',15,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',34,33)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',19,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',27,26)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('comp_of:N-N',31,34)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',15,19)	relation('obj:V-N',12,13)	relation('obj:V-N',21,23)	relation('subj:V-N',12,11)	relation('comp_after:V-N',21,31)	relation('obj:V-N',2,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',23,27)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',15,13)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',15,4)

ID	2997585-2
sentence	The rpoD locus lay between aroD and lys, tightly linked to dnaE and inseparable from crsA.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'rpoD',4,7)	word(2,'locus',9,13)	word(3,'lay',15,17)	word(4,'between',19,25)	word(5,'aroD',27,30)	word(6,'and',32,34)	word(7,'lys',36,38)	word(8,'tightly',41,47)	word(9,'linked',49,54)	word(10,'to',56,57)	word(11,'dnaE',59,62)	word(12,'and',64,66)	word(13,'inseparable',68,78)	word(14,'from',80,83)	word(15,'crsA',85,88)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'rpoD')	lemma(2,'locus')	lemma(3,'lie')	lemma(4,'between')	lemma(5,'aroD')	lemma(6,'and')	lemma(7,'lys')	lemma(8,'tightly')	lemma(9,'link')	lemma(10,'to')	lemma(11,'dnaE')	lemma(12,'and')	lemma(13,'inseparable')	lemma(14,'from')	lemma(15,'crsA')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',9,8)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,7)	relation('comp_from:ADJ-N',13,15)	relation('comp_between:V-N',3,5)	relation('comp_between:V-N',3,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('comp_to:V_PASS-N',9,11)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,5)	relation('subj:V-N',3,2)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',5,13)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',7,13)

ID	2997585-5
sentence	Both dnaE and rpoD were transcribed in the same direction, counterclockwise on the chromosome.
words	word(0,'Both',0,3)	word(1,'dnaE',5,8)	word(2,'and',10,12)	word(3,'rpoD',14,17)	word(4,'were',19,22)	word(5,'transcribed',24,34)	word(6,'in',36,37)	word(7,'the',39,41)	word(8,'same',43,46)	word(9,'direction',48,56)	word(10,'counterclockwise',59,74)	word(11,'on',76,77)	word(12,'the',79,81)	word(13,'chromosome',83,92)
lemmas	lemma(0,'both')	lemma(1,'dnaE')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'rpoD')	lemma(4,'be')	lemma(5,'transcribe')	lemma(6,'in')	lemma(7,'the')	lemma(8,'same')	lemma(9,'direction')	lemma(10,'contraclockwise')	lemma(11,'on')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'chromosome')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',5,1)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',10,13)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',5,3)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',5,9)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',9,10)

ID	3036777-3
sentence	S1 nuclease mapping experiments showed that the sdh operon is transcribed from a sigma-43 promoter; the transcript starts at a guanosine residue 90 base pairs upstream from the first gene of the operon, sdhC.
words	word(0,'S1',0,1)	word(1,'nuclease',3,10)	word(2,'mapping',12,18)	word(3,'experiments',20,30)	word(4,'showed',32,37)	word(5,'that',39,42)	word(6,'the',44,46)	word(7,'sdh',48,50)	word(8,'operon',52,57)	word(9,'is',59,60)	word(10,'transcribed',62,72)	word(11,'from',74,77)	word(12,'a',79,79)	word(13,'sigma-43',81,88)	word(14,'promoter',90,97)	word(15,'the',100,102)	word(16,'transcript',104,113)	word(17,'starts',115,120)	word(18,'at',122,123)	word(19,'a',125,125)	word(20,'guanosine',127,135)	word(21,'residue',137,143)	word(22,'90',145,146)	word(23,'base',148,151)	word(24,'pairs',153,157)	word(25,'upstream',159,166)	word(26,'from',168,171)	word(27,'the',173,175)	word(28,'first',177,181)	word(29,'gene',183,186)	word(30,'of',188,189)	word(31,'the',191,193)	word(32,'operon',195,200)	word(33,'sdhC',203,206)
lemmas	lemma(0,'S1')	lemma(1,'nuclease')	lemma(2,'mapping')	lemma(3,'experiment')	lemma(4,'show')	lemma(5,'that')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'sdh')	lemma(8,'operon')	lemma(9,'be')	lemma(10,'transcribe')	lemma(11,'from')	lemma(12,'a')	lemma(13,'sigma-43')	lemma(14,'promoter')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'transcript')	lemma(17,'start')	lemma(18,'at')	lemma(19,'a')	lemma(20,'guanosine')	lemma(21,'residue')	lemma(22,'90')	lemma(23,'base')	lemma(24,'pair')	lemma(25,'upstream')	lemma(26,'from')	lemma(27,'the')	lemma(28,'first')	lemma(29,'gene')	lemma(30,'of')	lemma(31,'the')	lemma(32,'operon')	lemma(33,'sdhC')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADV-N',25,24)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('subj:V-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('appos',32,33)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',10,8)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',24,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('comp_from:ADV-N',25,29)	relation('mod:V-ADV',17,25)	relation('comp_of:N-N',29,32)	relation('comp_at:V-N',17,21)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',10,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('subj:V-N',17,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)

ID	3086839-2
sentence	The complete nucleotide sequence of a 5 kb fragment including the entire rpoD gene revealed the presence of two other genes preceding rpoD in the order P23-dnaE-rpoD.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'complete',4,11)	word(2,'nucleotide',13,22)	word(3,'sequence',24,31)	word(4,'of',33,34)	word(5,'a',36,36)	word(6,'5',38,38)	word(7,'kb',40,41)	word(8,'fragment',43,50)	word(9,'including',52,60)	word(10,'the',62,64)	word(11,'entire',66,71)	word(12,'rpoD',73,76)	word(13,'gene',78,81)	word(14,'revealed',83,90)	word(15,'the',92,94)	word(16,'presence',96,103)	word(17,'of',105,106)	word(18,'two',108,110)	word(19,'other',112,116)	word(20,'genes',118,122)	word(21,'preceding',124,132)	word(22,'rpoD',134,137)	word(23,'in',139,140)	word(24,'the',142,144)	word(25,'order',146,150)	word(26,'P23',152,154)	word(27,'dnaE',156,159)	word(28,'rpoD',161,164)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'complete')	lemma(2,'nucleotide')	lemma(3,'sequence')	lemma(4,'of')	lemma(5,'a')	lemma(6,'5')	lemma(7,'kb')	lemma(8,'fragment')	lemma(9,'include')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'entire')	lemma(12,'rpoD')	lemma(13,'gene')	lemma(14,'reveal')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'presence')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'two')	lemma(19,'other')	lemma(20,'gene')	lemma(21,'precede')	lemma(22,'rpoD')	lemma(23,'in')	lemma(24,'the')	lemma(25,'order')	lemma(26,'P23')	lemma(27,'dnaE')	lemma(28,'rpoD')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',20,18)	relation('comp_of:N-N',3,8)	relation('mod_post:N-N',25,28)	relation('obj:V-N',14,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('obj:V-N',21,22)	relation('subj:V-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',19,18)	relation('mod_post:N-N',25,26)	relation('subj:V-N',14,3)	relation('subj:V-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('obj:V-N',9,13)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',13,11)	relation('mod_post:N-N',25,27)	relation('comp_in:V-N',21,25)

ID	3104146-3
sentence	In the present report we describe a promoter that is adjacent to the rrnB region of the B. subtilis chromosome and is utilized in vitro and in vivo by E sigma 29.
words	word(0,'In',0,1)	word(1,'the',3,5)	word(2,'present',7,13)	word(3,'report',15,20)	word(4,'we',22,23)	word(5,'describe',25,32)	word(6,'a',34,34)	word(7,'promoter',36,43)	word(8,'that',45,48)	word(9,'is',50,51)	word(10,'adjacent',53,60)	word(11,'to',62,63)	word(12,'the',65,67)	word(13,'rrnB',69,72)	word(14,'region',74,79)	word(15,'of',81,82)	word(16,'the',84,86)	word(17,'B. subtilis',88,98)	word(18,'chromosome',100,109)	word(19,'and',111,113)	word(20,'is',115,116)	word(21,'utilized',118,125)	word(22,'in',127,128)	word(23,'vitro',130,134)	word(24,'and',136,138)	word(25,'in',140,141)	word(26,'vivo',143,146)	word(27,'by',148,149)	word(28,'E sigma 29',151,160)
lemmas	lemma(0,'in')	lemma(1,'the')	lemma(2,'present')	lemma(3,'report')	lemma(4,'we')	lemma(5,'describe')	lemma(6,'a')	lemma(7,'promoter')	lemma(8,'that')	lemma(9,'be')	lemma(10,'adjacent')	lemma(11,'to')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'rrnB')	lemma(14,'region')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(18,'chromosome')	lemma(19,'and')	lemma(20,'be')	lemma(21,'utilize')	lemma(22,'in')	lemma(23,'vitro')	lemma(24,'and')	lemma(25,'in')	lemma(26,'vivo')	lemma(27,'by')	lemma(28,'E sigma 29')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',21,23)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',21,28)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,2)	relation('comp_in:V-N',5,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',7,10)	relation('subj:V-N',5,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,18)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',21,26)	relation('obj:V-N',5,7)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,7)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',10,14)

ID	3106319-2
sentence	One sigma factor, which appears 2 h after the initiation of sporulation, is sigma E (formerly sigma 29).
words	word(0,'One',0,2)	word(1,'sigma',4,8)	word(2,'factor',10,15)	word(3,'which',18,22)	word(4,'appears',24,30)	word(5,'2',32,32)	word(6,'h',34,34)	word(7,'after',36,40)	word(8,'the',42,44)	word(9,'initiation',46,55)	word(10,'of',57,58)	word(11,'sporulation',60,70)	word(12,'is',73,74)	word(13,'sigma E',76,82)	word(14,'formerly',85,92)	word(15,'sigma 29',94,101)
lemmas	lemma(0,'One')	lemma(1,'sigma')	lemma(2,'factor')	lemma(3,'which')	lemma(4,'appear')	lemma(5,'2')	lemma(6,'h')	lemma(7,'after')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'initiation')	lemma(10,'of')	lemma(11,'sporulation')	lemma(12,'be')	lemma(13,'sigE')	lemma(14,'formerly')	lemma(15,'sigma 29')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',9,11)	relation('comp_after:V-N',4,9)	relation('subj:V-N',4,2)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',2,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('appos',13,15)

ID	3114422-6
sentence	One branch leads to expression of spoVA within the spore compartment, the other to expression of spoIIIC in the mother cell.
words	word(0,'One',0,2)	word(1,'branch',4,9)	word(2,'leads',11,15)	word(3,'to',17,18)	word(4,'expression',20,29)	word(5,'of',31,32)	word(6,'spoVA',34,38)	word(7,'within',40,45)	word(8,'the',47,49)	word(9,'spore',51,55)	word(10,'compartment',57,67)	word(11,'the',70,72)	word(12,'other',74,78)	word(13,'to',80,81)	word(14,'expression',83,92)	word(15,'of',94,95)	word(16,'spoIIIC',97,103)	word(17,'in',105,106)	word(18,'the',108,110)	word(19,'mother',112,117)	word(20,'cell',119,122)
lemmas	lemma(0,'One')	lemma(1,'branch')	lemma(2,'lead')	lemma(3,'to')	lemma(4,'expression')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'spoVA')	lemma(7,'within')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'swarm')	lemma(10,'compartment')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'other')	lemma(13,'to')	lemma(14,'expression')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'spoIIIC')	lemma(17,'in')	lemma(18,'the')	lemma(19,'mother')	lemma(20,'cell')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:V-N',2,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,16)	relation('comp_in:N-N',14,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',20,19)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('comp_within:N-N',4,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('comp_of:N-N',4,6)	relation('comp_to:V-N',2,14)	relation('subj:V-N',2,12)

ID	3123701-3
sentence	Transcription of amyE initiates in vitro from a promoter recognized by the major vegetative form of RNA polymerase, E sigma 43.
words	word(0,'Transcription',0,12)	word(1,'of',14,15)	word(2,'amyE',17,20)	word(3,'initiates',22,30)	word(4,'in',32,33)	word(5,'vitro',35,39)	word(6,'from',41,44)	word(7,'a',46,46)	word(8,'promoter',48,55)	word(9,'recognized',57,66)	word(10,'by',68,69)	word(11,'the',71,73)	word(12,'major',75,79)	word(13,'vegetative',81,90)	word(14,'form',92,95)	word(15,'of',97,98)	word(16,'RNA',100,102)	word(17,'polymerase',104,113)	word(18,'E sigma 43',116,125)
lemmas	lemma(0,'transcription')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'amyE')	lemma(3,'initiate')	lemma(4,'in')	lemma(5,'vitro')	lemma(6,'from')	lemma(7,'a')	lemma(8,'promoter')	lemma(9,'recognize')	lemma(10,'by')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'major')	lemma(13,'vegetative')	lemma(14,'form')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'RNA')	lemma(17,'polymerase')	lemma(18,'E sigma 43')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,8)	relation('comp_from:V-N',3,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,2)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,13)	relation('comp_in:V-N',3,5)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,17)	relation('appos',17,18)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',9,14)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,12)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)

ID	3127379-1
sentence	Three promoters direct transcription of the sigA (rpoD) operon in Bacillus subtilis.
words	word(0,'Three',0,4)	word(1,'promoters',6,14)	word(2,'direct',16,21)	word(3,'transcription',23,35)	word(4,'of',37,38)	word(5,'the',40,42)	word(6,'sigA',44,47)	word(7,'rpoD',50,53)	word(8,'operon',56,61)	word(9,'in',63,64)	word(10,'Bacillus subtilis',66,82)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Three')	lemma(1,'promoter')	lemma(2,'direct')	lemma(3,'transcription')	lemma(4,'of')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'sigA')	lemma(7,'rpoD')	lemma(8,'operon')	lemma(9,'in')	lemma(10,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',3,8)	relation('appos',6,7)	relation('obj:V-N',2,3)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,6)	relation('comp_in:N-N',8,10)

ID	3134591-1
sentence	Nuclease S1 mapping was used to identify the transcription start points of the spoIIA and spoVA operons of Bacillus subtilis.
words	word(0,'Nuclease',0,7)	word(1,'S1',9,10)	word(2,'mapping',12,18)	word(3,'was',20,22)	word(4,'used',24,27)	word(5,'to',29,30)	word(6,'identify',32,39)	word(7,'the',41,43)	word(8,'transcription',45,57)	word(9,'start',59,63)	word(10,'points',65,70)	word(11,'of',72,73)	word(12,'the',75,77)	word(13,'spoIIA',79,84)	word(14,'and',86,88)	word(15,'spoVA',90,94)	word(16,'operons',96,102)	word(17,'of',104,105)	word(18,'Bacillus subtilis',107,123)
lemmas	lemma(0,'nuclease')	lemma(1,'S1')	lemma(2,'mapping')	lemma(3,'be')	lemma(4,'use')	lemma(5,'to')	lemma(6,'identify')	lemma(7,'the')	lemma(8,'transcription')	lemma(9,'start')	lemma(10,'point')	lemma(11,'of')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'spoIIA')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'spoVA')	lemma(16,'operon')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:V_PASS-V',4,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('obj:V-N',6,10)	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,16)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,13)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',4,2)

ID	3919021-2
sentence	We have now determined the 1809-base pair sequence of the dnaE coding region, which precedes rpoD and is transcribed in the same counterclockwise direction on the chromosome.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'have',3,6)	word(2,'now',8,10)	word(3,'determined',12,21)	word(4,'the',23,25)	word(5,'1809-base',27,35)	word(6,'pair',37,40)	word(7,'sequence',42,49)	word(8,'of',51,52)	word(9,'the',54,56)	word(10,'dnaE',58,61)	word(11,'coding',63,68)	word(12,'region',70,75)	word(13,'which',78,82)	word(14,'precedes',84,91)	word(15,'rpoD',93,96)	word(16,'and',98,100)	word(17,'is',102,103)	word(18,'transcribed',105,115)	word(19,'in',117,118)	word(20,'the',120,122)	word(21,'same',124,127)	word(22,'counterclockwise',129,144)	word(23,'direction',146,154)	word(24,'on',156,157)	word(25,'the',159,161)	word(26,'chromosome',163,172)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'have')	lemma(2,'now')	lemma(3,'determine')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'1809-base')	lemma(6,'pair')	lemma(7,'sequence')	lemma(8,'of')	lemma(9,'the')	lemma(10,'dnaE')	lemma(11,'code')	lemma(12,'region')	lemma(13,'which')	lemma(14,'precede')	lemma(15,'rpoD')	lemma(16,'and')	lemma(17,'be')	lemma(18,'transcribe')	lemma(19,'in')	lemma(20,'the')	lemma(21,'same')	lemma(22,'counterclockwise')	lemma(23,'direction')	lemma(24,'on')	lemma(25,'the')	lemma(26,'chromosome')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADJ-N',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',23,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('subj:V-N',14,12)	relation('comp_of:N-N',7,12)	relation('obj:V-N',3,7)	relation('comp_on:N-N',23,26)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,11)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',18,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod:V-ADV',3,2)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',18,23)	relation('obj:V-N',14,15)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)

ID	3919317-5
sentence	Here we report that several base substitutions in the ctc promoter differentially affect the utilization of the promoter by E sigma 37 or E sigma 29.
words	word(0,'Here',0,3)	word(1,'we',5,6)	word(2,'report',8,13)	word(3,'that',15,18)	word(4,'several',20,26)	word(5,'base',28,31)	word(6,'substitutions',33,45)	word(7,'in',47,48)	word(8,'the',50,52)	word(9,'ctc',54,56)	word(10,'promoter',58,65)	word(11,'differentially',67,80)	word(12,'affect',82,87)	word(13,'the',89,91)	word(14,'utilization',93,103)	word(15,'of',105,106)	word(16,'the',108,110)	word(17,'promoter',112,119)	word(18,'by',121,122)	word(19,'E sigma 37',124,133)	word(20,'or',135,136)	word(21,'E sigma 29',138,147)
lemmas	lemma(0,'here')	lemma(1,'we')	lemma(2,'report')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'several')	lemma(5,'base')	lemma(6,'substitution')	lemma(7,'in')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'ctc')	lemma(10,'promoter')	lemma(11,'differentially')	lemma(12,'affect')	lemma(13,'the')	lemma(14,'utilization')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'promoter')	lemma(18,'by')	lemma(19,'E sigma 37')	lemma(20,'or')	lemma(21,'E sigma 29')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('obj:V-N',12,14)	relation('mod:V-ADV',12,11)	relation('comp_in:N-N',6,10)	relation('comp_by:N-N',17,19)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,0)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,17)	relation('comp_by:N-N',17,21)	relation('subj:V-N',12,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)

ID	7494476-1
sentence	The promoter (amyP) of the Bacillus subtilis alpha-amylase gene, which is recognized by E sigma A, has a three out of six match to the consensus promoter in both the -35 and -10 hexamers.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'promoter',4,11)	word(2,'amyP',14,17)	word(3,'of',20,21)	word(4,'the',23,25)	word(5,'Bacillus subtilis',27,43)	word(6,'alpha-amylase',45,57)	word(7,'gene',59,62)	word(8,'which',65,69)	word(9,'is',71,72)	word(10,'recognized',74,83)	word(11,'by',85,86)	word(12,'E sigma A',88,96)	word(13,'has',99,101)	word(14,'a',103,103)	word(15,'three',105,109)	word(16,'out',111,113)	word(17,'of',115,116)	word(18,'six',118,120)	word(19,'match',122,126)	word(20,'to',128,129)	word(21,'the',131,133)	word(22,'consensus',135,143)	word(23,'promoter',145,152)	word(24,'in',154,155)	word(25,'both',157,160)	word(26,'the',162,164)	word(27,'-35',166,168)	word(28,'and',170,172)	word(29,'-10',174,176)	word(30,'hexamers',178,185)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'promoter')	lemma(2,'amyP')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(6,'alpha-amylase')	lemma(7,'gene')	lemma(8,'which')	lemma(9,'be')	lemma(10,'recognize')	lemma(11,'by')	lemma(12,'E sigma A')	lemma(13,'have')	lemma(14,'a')	lemma(15,'three')	lemma(16,'out')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'six')	lemma(19,'match')	lemma(20,'to')	lemma(21,'the')	lemma(22,'consensus')	lemma(23,'promoter')	lemma(24,'in')	lemma(25,'both')	lemma(26,'the')	lemma(27,'-35')	lemma(28,'and')	lemma(29,'-10')	lemma(30,'hexamers')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_in:N-N',19,30)	relation('comp_to:N-N',19,23)	relation('comp_of:N-N',15,19)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,27)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,29)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',10,12)	relation('subj:V-N',13,1)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',23,22)	relation('appos',1,2)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',10,7)	relation('obj:V-N',13,15)

ID	7494477-6
sentence	Two such amino acid substitutions were isolated in sigma A and one was isolated in sigma H.
words	word(0,'Two',0,2)	word(1,'such',4,7)	word(2,'amino',9,13)	word(3,'acid',15,18)	word(4,'substitutions',20,32)	word(5,'were',34,37)	word(6,'isolated',39,46)	word(7,'in',48,49)	word(8,'sigma A',51,57)	word(9,'and',59,61)	word(10,'one',63,65)	word(11,'was',67,69)	word(12,'isolated',71,78)	word(13,'in',80,81)	word(14,'sigma H',83,89)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Two')	lemma(1,'such')	lemma(2,'amino')	lemma(3,'acid')	lemma(4,'substitution')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'isolate')	lemma(7,'in')	lemma(8,'sigA')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'one')	lemma(11,'be')	lemma(12,'isolate')	lemma(13,'in')	lemma(14,'sigH')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',10,12)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,2)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',4,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('comp_in:ADJ-N',6,8)	relation('comp_in:ADJ-N',12,14)

ID	7540694-1
sentence	Three genes called rocD, rocE and rocF were found near the rocR gene in B. subtilis.
words	word(0,'Three',0,4)	word(1,'genes',6,10)	word(2,'called',12,17)	word(3,'rocD',19,22)	word(4,'rocE',25,28)	word(5,'and',30,32)	word(6,'rocF',34,37)	word(7,'were',39,42)	word(8,'found',44,48)	word(9,'near',50,53)	word(10,'the',55,57)	word(11,'rocR',59,62)	word(12,'gene',64,67)	word(13,'in',69,70)	word(14,'B. subtilis',72,82)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Three')	lemma(1,'gene')	lemma(2,'call')	lemma(3,'rocD')	lemma(4,'rocE')	lemma(5,'and')	lemma(6,'rocF')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'find')	lemma(9,'near')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'rocR')	lemma(12,'gene')	lemma(13,'in')	lemma(14,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_near:V_PASS-N',8,12)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',1,0)	relation('obj:V-N',2,4)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',8,14)	relation('obj:V-N',2,6)	relation('obj:V-N',2,3)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',8,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)

ID	7570023-2
sentence	The activity of sigma F is governed by SpoIIAA, SpoIIAB, and SpoIIE, a membrane protein localized at the polar septum.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'activity',4,11)	word(2,'of',13,14)	word(3,'sigma F',16,22)	word(4,'is',24,25)	word(5,'governed',27,34)	word(6,'by',36,37)	word(7,'SpoIIAA',39,45)	word(8,'SpoIIAB',48,54)	word(9,'and',57,59)	word(10,'SpoIIE',61,66)	word(11,'a',69,69)	word(12,'membrane',71,78)	word(13,'protein',80,86)	word(14,'localized',88,96)	word(15,'at',98,99)	word(16,'the',101,103)	word(17,'polar',105,109)	word(18,'septum',111,116)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'activity')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'sigF')	lemma(4,'be')	lemma(5,'govern')	lemma(6,'by')	lemma(7,'SpoIIAA')	lemma(8,'SpoIIAB')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'SpoIIE')	lemma(11,'a')	lemma(12,'membrane')	lemma(13,'protein')	lemma(14,'localize')	lemma(15,'at')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'polar')	lemma(18,'septum')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('appos',7,8)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',5,7)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',5,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',18,17)	relation('appos',7,10)	relation('appos',7,13)	relation('comp_at:V_PASS-N',14,18)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',14,13)

ID	7570023-4
sentence	SpoIIAB is also a serine kinase that inactivates SpoIIAA.
words	word(0,'SpoIIAB',0,6)	word(1,'is',8,9)	word(2,'also',11,14)	word(3,'a',16,16)	word(4,'serine',18,23)	word(5,'kinase',25,30)	word(6,'that',32,35)	word(7,'inactivates',37,47)	word(8,'SpoIIAA',49,55)
lemmas	lemma(0,'SpoIIAB')	lemma(1,'be')	lemma(2,'also')	lemma(3,'a')	lemma(4,'serine')	lemma(5,'kinase')	lemma(6,'that')	lemma(7,'inactivate')	lemma(8,'SpoIIAA')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('mod:V-ADV',1,2)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',0,5)	relation('subj:V-N',7,5)	relation('obj:V-N',7,8)

ID	7592487-2
sentence	The promoter of this operon is recognized by RNA polymerase containing the sigma 54-like factor sigma L.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'promoter',4,11)	word(2,'of',13,14)	word(3,'this',16,19)	word(4,'operon',21,26)	word(5,'is',28,29)	word(6,'recognized',31,40)	word(7,'by',42,43)	word(8,'RNA',45,47)	word(9,'polymerase',49,58)	word(10,'containing',60,69)	word(11,'the',71,73)	word(12,'sigma 54',75,82)	word(13,'like',84,87)	word(14,'factor',89,94)	word(15,'sigma L',96,102)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'promoter')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'this')	lemma(4,'operon')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'recognize')	lemma(7,'by')	lemma(8,'RNA')	lemma(9,'polymerase')	lemma(10,'contain')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'sigN')	lemma(13,'like')	lemma(14,'factor')	lemma(15,'sigL')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',6,9)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,4)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('subj:V-N',10,9)	relation('obj:V-N',10,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',13,12)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,13)

ID	7642487-6
sentence	Finally, we present evidence that SinR controls sporulation through several independent genes, i.e., sp0A, spoIIA, and possibly spoIIG and spoIIE.
words	word(0,'Finally',0,6)	word(1,'we',9,10)	word(2,'present',12,18)	word(3,'evidence',20,27)	word(4,'that',29,32)	word(5,'SinR',34,37)	word(6,'controls',39,46)	word(7,'sporulation',48,58)	word(8,'through',60,66)	word(9,'several',68,74)	word(10,'independent',76,86)	word(11,'genes',88,92)	word(12,'i.e.',95,98)	word(13,'sp0A',101,104)	word(14,'spoIIA',107,112)	word(15,'and',115,117)	word(16,'possibly',119,126)	word(17,'spoIIG',128,133)	word(18,'and',135,137)	word(19,'spoIIE',139,144)
lemmas	lemma(0,'finally')	lemma(1,'we')	lemma(2,'present')	lemma(3,'evidence')	lemma(4,'that')	lemma(5,'SinR')	lemma(6,'control')	lemma(7,'sporulation')	lemma(8,'through')	lemma(9,'several')	lemma(10,'independent')	lemma(11,'gene')	lemma(12,'i.e.')	lemma(13,'sp0A')	lemma(14,'spoIIA')	lemma(15,'and')	lemma(16,'possibly')	lemma(17,'spoIIG')	lemma(18,'and')	lemma(19,'spoIIE')
syntactic_relations	relation('appos',11,13)	relation('comp_through:V-N',6,11)	relation('obj:V-N',6,7)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',11,9)	relation('appos',11,17)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,10)	relation('subj:V-N',6,5)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,0)	relation('appos',11,14)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('obj:V-N',2,3)	relation('appos',11,19)

ID	7642514-1
sentence	Activation of pro-sigma K processing in the mother cell at late stages of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis requires the presence of active sigma G in the forespore.
words	word(0,'Activation',0,9)	word(1,'of',11,12)	word(2,'pro-sigma K',14,24)	word(3,'processing',26,35)	word(4,'in',37,38)	word(5,'the',40,42)	word(6,'mother',44,49)	word(7,'cell',51,54)	word(8,'at',56,57)	word(9,'late',59,62)	word(10,'stages',64,69)	word(11,'of',71,72)	word(12,'sporulation',74,84)	word(13,'in',86,87)	word(14,'Bacillus subtilis',89,105)	word(15,'requires',107,114)	word(16,'the',116,118)	word(17,'presence',120,127)	word(18,'of',129,130)	word(19,'active',132,137)	word(20,'sigma G',139,145)	word(21,'in',147,148)	word(22,'the',150,152)	word(23,'forespore',154,162)
lemmas	lemma(0,'activation')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'pro-sigma K')	lemma(3,'processing')	lemma(4,'in')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'mother')	lemma(7,'cell')	lemma(8,'at')	lemma(9,'late')	lemma(10,'stage')	lemma(11,'of')	lemma(12,'sporulation')	lemma(13,'in')	lemma(14,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(15,'require')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'presence')	lemma(18,'of')	lemma(19,'active')	lemma(20,'sigG')	lemma(21,'in')	lemma(22,'the')	lemma(23,'forespore')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,12)	relation('obj:V-N',15,17)	relation('comp_in:N-N',3,7)	relation('comp_at:N-N',3,10)	relation('comp_of:N-N',17,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',20,19)	relation('subj:V-N',15,0)	relation('comp_in:N-N',12,14)	relation('comp_in:V-N',15,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)

ID	7679386-7
sentence	Such promoters depend on sigma factors (sigma D and sigma F, respectively) particularly similar to the deduced whiG gene product.
words	word(0,'Such',0,3)	word(1,'promoters',5,13)	word(2,'depend',15,20)	word(3,'on',22,23)	word(4,'sigma',25,29)	word(5,'factors',31,37)	word(6,'sigma D',40,46)	word(7,'and',48,50)	word(8,'sigma F',52,58)	word(9,'respectively',61,72)	word(10,'particularly',75,86)	word(11,'similar',88,94)	word(12,'to',96,97)	word(13,'the',99,101)	word(14,'deduced',103,109)	word(15,'whiG',111,114)	word(16,'gene',116,119)	word(17,'product',121,127)
lemmas	lemma(0,'such')	lemma(1,'promoter')	lemma(2,'depend')	lemma(3,'on')	lemma(4,'sigma')	lemma(5,'factor')	lemma(6,'sigD')	lemma(7,'and')	lemma(8,'sigF')	lemma(9,'respectively')	lemma(10,'particularly')	lemma(11,'similar')	lemma(12,'to')	lemma(13,'the')	lemma(14,'deduce')	lemma(15,'whiG')	lemma(16,'gene')	lemma(17,'product')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('appos',5,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',17,14)	relation('appos',5,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',11,17)	relation('comp_on:V-N',2,5)	relation('mod:ADJ-ADV',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,15)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',5,11)

ID	7704261-1
sentence	As part of the Bacillus subtilis genome sequencing project, we have determined the complete nucleotide sequence of a skin element which is located between spoIVCB and spoIIIC.
words	word(0,'As',0,1)	word(1,'part',3,6)	word(2,'of',8,9)	word(3,'the',11,13)	word(4,'Bacillus subtilis',15,31)	word(5,'genome',33,38)	word(6,'sequencing',40,49)	word(7,'project',51,57)	word(8,'we',60,61)	word(9,'have',63,66)	word(10,'determined',68,77)	word(11,'the',79,81)	word(12,'complete',83,90)	word(13,'nucleotide',92,101)	word(14,'sequence',103,110)	word(15,'of',112,113)	word(16,'a',115,115)	word(17,'skin',117,120)	word(18,'element',122,128)	word(19,'which',130,134)	word(20,'is',136,137)	word(21,'located',139,145)	word(22,'between',147,153)	word(23,'spoIVCB',155,161)	word(24,'and',163,165)	word(25,'spoIIIC',167,173)
lemmas	lemma(0,'as')	lemma(1,'part')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'the')	lemma(4,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(5,'genome')	lemma(6,'sequence')	lemma(7,'project')	lemma(8,'we')	lemma(9,'have')	lemma(10,'determine')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'complete')	lemma(13,'nucleotide')	lemma(14,'sequence')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'a')	lemma(17,'skin')	lemma(18,'element')	lemma(19,'which')	lemma(20,'be')	lemma(21,'locate')	lemma(22,'between')	lemma(23,'spoIVCB')	lemma(24,'and')	lemma(25,'spoIIIC')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,7)	relation('comp_between:V_PASS-N',21,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('comp_between:V_PASS-N',21,25)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,18)	relation('subj:V-N',10,8)	relation('comp_as:V-N',10,1)	relation('obj:V-N',10,14)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,18)

ID	7768864-10
sentence	Analysis of RNA isolated from a sigma B deletion mutant revealed that the transcription of gspA is sigma B dependent.
words	word(0,'Analysis',0,7)	word(1,'of',9,10)	word(2,'RNA',12,14)	word(3,'isolated',16,23)	word(4,'from',25,28)	word(5,'a',30,30)	word(6,'sigma B',32,38)	word(7,'deletion',40,47)	word(8,'mutant',49,54)	word(9,'revealed',56,63)	word(10,'that',65,68)	word(11,'the',70,72)	word(12,'transcription',74,86)	word(13,'of',88,89)	word(14,'gspA',91,94)	word(15,'is',96,97)	word(16,'sigma B',99,105)	word(17,'dependent',107,115)
lemmas	lemma(0,'analysis')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'RNA')	lemma(3,'isolate')	lemma(4,'from')	lemma(5,'a')	lemma(6,'sigB')	lemma(7,'deletion')	lemma(8,'mutant')	lemma(9,'reveal')	lemma(10,'that')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'transcription')	lemma(13,'of')	lemma(14,'gspA')	lemma(15,'be')	lemma(16,'sigB')	lemma(17,'dependent')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,2)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,14)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',3,8)	relation('subj:V-N',9,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',12,17)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',3,2)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',17,16)

ID	7797557-6
sentence	The hydropathy profiles of the dltB and dltD gene products suggest a transmembrane location for the former and an amino-terminal signal peptide for the latter.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'hydropathy',4,13)	word(2,'profiles',15,22)	word(3,'of',24,25)	word(4,'the',27,29)	word(5,'dltB',31,34)	word(6,'and',36,38)	word(7,'dltD',40,43)	word(8,'gene',45,48)	word(9,'products',50,57)	word(10,'suggest',59,65)	word(11,'a',67,67)	word(12,'transmembrane',69,81)	word(13,'location',83,90)	word(14,'for',92,94)	word(15,'the',96,98)	word(16,'former',100,105)	word(17,'and',107,109)	word(18,'an',111,112)	word(19,'amino-terminal',114,127)	word(20,'signal',129,134)	word(21,'peptide',136,142)	word(22,'for',144,146)	word(23,'the',148,150)	word(24,'latter',152,157)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'hydropathy')	lemma(2,'profile')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'dltB')	lemma(6,'and')	lemma(7,'dltD')	lemma(8,'gene')	lemma(9,'product')	lemma(10,'suggest')	lemma(11,'a')	lemma(12,'transmembrane')	lemma(13,'location')	lemma(14,'for')	lemma(15,'the')	lemma(16,'former')	lemma(17,'and')	lemma(18,'an')	lemma(19,'amino-terminal')	lemma(20,'signal')	lemma(21,'peptide')	lemma(22,'for')	lemma(23,'the')	lemma(24,'latter')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',21,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',13,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('comp_for:N-N',13,16)	relation('obj:V-N',10,21)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('comp_of:N-N',2,9)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,5)	relation('comp_for:N-N',21,24)	relation('subj:V-N',10,2)	relation('obj:V-N',10,13)

ID	7814326-6
sentence	Like the promoter for cotB, the cotG promoter is induced at a late stage of sporulation under the control of the RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma K and the DNA-binding protein GerE.
words	word(0,'Like',0,3)	word(1,'the',5,7)	word(2,'promoter',9,16)	word(3,'for',18,20)	word(4,'cotB',22,25)	word(5,'the',28,30)	word(6,'cotG',32,35)	word(7,'promoter',37,44)	word(8,'is',46,47)	word(9,'induced',49,55)	word(10,'at',57,58)	word(11,'a',60,60)	word(12,'late',62,65)	word(13,'stage',67,71)	word(14,'of',73,74)	word(15,'sporulation',76,86)	word(16,'under',88,92)	word(17,'the',94,96)	word(18,'control',98,104)	word(19,'of',106,107)	word(20,'the',109,111)	word(21,'RNA',113,115)	word(22,'polymerase',117,126)	word(23,'sigma',128,132)	word(24,'factor',134,139)	word(25,'sigma K',141,147)	word(26,'and',149,151)	word(27,'the',153,155)	word(28,'DNA-binding',157,167)	word(29,'protein',169,175)	word(30,'GerE',177,180)
lemmas	lemma(0,'like')	lemma(1,'the')	lemma(2,'promoter')	lemma(3,'for')	lemma(4,'cotB')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'cotG')	lemma(7,'promoter')	lemma(8,'be')	lemma(9,'induce')	lemma(10,'at')	lemma(11,'a')	lemma(12,'late')	lemma(13,'stage')	lemma(14,'of')	lemma(15,'sporulation')	lemma(16,'under')	lemma(17,'the')	lemma(18,'control')	lemma(19,'of')	lemma(20,'the')	lemma(21,'RNA')	lemma(22,'polymerase')	lemma(23,'sigma')	lemma(24,'factor')	lemma(25,'sigK')	lemma(26,'and')	lemma(27,'the')	lemma(28,'DNA-binding')	lemma(29,'protein')	lemma(30,'GerE')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',13,12)	relation('comp_at:V_PASS-N',9,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,21)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',29,28)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,23)	relation('comp_like:V_PASS-N',9,2)	relation('comp_for:N-N',2,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',18,30)	relation('comp_under:V_PASS-N',9,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',30,29)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',13,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',25,24)	relation('comp_of:N-N',18,25)

ID	7883171-2
sentence	Activation of sigma E depends on sigma F, the factor that governs transcription in the forespore.
words	word(0,'Activation',0,9)	word(1,'of',11,12)	word(2,'sigma E',14,20)	word(3,'depends',22,28)	word(4,'on',30,31)	word(5,'sigma F',33,39)	word(6,'the',42,44)	word(7,'factor',46,51)	word(8,'that',53,56)	word(9,'governs',58,64)	word(10,'transcription',66,78)	word(11,'in',80,81)	word(12,'the',83,85)	word(13,'forespore',87,95)
lemmas	lemma(0,'activation')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'sigE')	lemma(3,'depend')	lemma(4,'on')	lemma(5,'sigF')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'factor')	lemma(8,'that')	lemma(9,'govern')	lemma(10,'transcription')	lemma(11,'in')	lemma(12,'the')	lemma(13,'forespore')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_in:V-N',9,13)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,2)	relation('subj:V-N',9,7)	relation('obj:V-N',9,10)	relation('comp_on:V-N',3,5)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)	relation('appos',5,7)

ID	7883171-4
sentence	We have identified and characterized a sigma F-dependent gene, csfX, encoding a protein necessary and sufficient for triggering processing of pro-sigma E.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'have',3,6)	word(2,'identified',8,17)	word(3,'and',19,21)	word(4,'characterized',23,35)	word(5,'a',37,37)	word(6,'sigma F',39,45)	word(7,'dependent',47,55)	word(8,'gene',57,60)	word(9,'csfX',63,66)	word(10,'encoding',69,76)	word(11,'a',78,78)	word(12,'protein',80,86)	word(13,'necessary',88,96)	word(14,'and',98,100)	word(15,'sufficient',102,111)	word(16,'for',113,115)	word(17,'triggering',117,126)	word(18,'processing',128,137)	word(19,'of',139,140)	word(20,'pro-sigma E',142,152)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'have')	lemma(2,'identify')	lemma(3,'and')	lemma(4,'characterize')	lemma(5,'a')	lemma(6,'sigF')	lemma(7,'dependent')	lemma(8,'gene')	lemma(9,'csfX')	lemma(10,'encode')	lemma(11,'a')	lemma(12,'protein')	lemma(13,'necessary')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'sufficient')	lemma(16,'for')	lemma(17,'trigger')	lemma(18,'processing')	lemma(19,'of')	lemma(20,'pro-sigma E')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',4,0)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',8,7)	relation('subj:V-N',2,0)	relation('comp_of:N-N',20,18)	relation('obj:V-N',10,12)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',7,6)	relation('obj:V-N',17,18)	relation('obj:V-N',2,8)	relation('comp_for:ADJ-V',15,17)	relation('appos',8,9)	relation('comp_for:ADJ-V',13,17)	relation('subj:V-N',10,8)	relation('obj:V-N',4,8)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,15)

ID	7896717-1
sentence	SpoIIID is a sequence-specific, DNA-binding protein that activates or represses transcription of different genes by sigma K RNA polymerase in vitro.
words	word(0,'SpoIIID',0,6)	word(1,'is',8,9)	word(2,'a',11,11)	word(3,'sequence-specific',13,29)	word(4,'DNA-binding',32,42)	word(5,'protein',44,50)	word(6,'that',52,55)	word(7,'activates',57,65)	word(8,'or',67,68)	word(9,'represses',70,78)	word(10,'transcription',80,92)	word(11,'of',94,95)	word(12,'different',97,105)	word(13,'genes',107,111)	word(14,'by',113,114)	word(15,'sigma K',116,122)	word(16,'RNA',124,126)	word(17,'polymerase',128,137)	word(18,'in',139,140)	word(19,'vitro',142,146)
lemmas	lemma(0,'SpoIIID')	lemma(1,'be')	lemma(2,'a')	lemma(3,'sequence-specific')	lemma(4,'DNA-binding')	lemma(5,'protein')	lemma(6,'that')	lemma(7,'activate')	lemma(8,'or')	lemma(9,'repress')	lemma(10,'transcription')	lemma(11,'of')	lemma(12,'different')	lemma(13,'gene')	lemma(14,'by')	lemma(15,'sigK')	lemma(16,'RNA')	lemma(17,'polymerase')	lemma(18,'in')	lemma(19,'vitro')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('comp_by:V-N',9,17)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('comp_in:N-N',10,19)	relation('obj:V-N',9,10)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',5,3)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',0,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,13)	relation('subj:V-N',9,5)	relation('subj:V-N',7,5)	relation('obj:V-N',7,10)	relation('comp_by:V-N',7,17)

ID	7966271-1
sentence	Mother-cell-specific gene expression during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis is controlled by sigma E and sigma K RNA polymerases.
words	word(0,'Mother-cell-specific',0,19)	word(1,'gene',21,24)	word(2,'expression',26,35)	word(3,'during',37,42)	word(4,'sporulation',44,54)	word(5,'of',56,57)	word(6,'Bacillus subtilis',59,75)	word(7,'is',77,78)	word(8,'controlled',80,89)	word(9,'by',91,92)	word(10,'sigma E',94,100)	word(11,'and',102,104)	word(12,'sigma K',106,112)	word(13,'RNA',114,116)	word(14,'polymerases',118,128)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Mother-cell-specific')	lemma(1,'gene')	lemma(2,'expression')	lemma(3,'during')	lemma(4,'sporulation')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'control')	lemma(9,'by')	lemma(10,'sigE')	lemma(11,'and')	lemma(12,'sigK')	lemma(13,'RNA')	lemma(14,'polymerases')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,12)	relation('comp_during:N-N',2,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',8,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,10)	relation('comp_of:N-N',4,6)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',8,2)

ID	8002610-3
sentence	The sigma B structural gene, sigB, lies in an operon with three other genes whose products have been shown to control sigma B activity in response to environmental stress. 
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'sigma B',4,10)	word(2,'structural',12,21)	word(3,'gene',23,26)	word(4,'sigB',29,32)	word(5,'lies',35,38)	word(6,'in',40,41)	word(7,'an',43,44)	word(8,'operon',46,51)	word(9,'with',53,56)	word(10,'three',58,62)	word(11,'other',64,68)	word(12,'genes',70,74)	word(13,'whose',76,80)	word(14,'products',82,89)	word(15,'have',91,94)	word(16,'been',96,99)	word(17,'shown',101,105)	word(18,'to',107,108)	word(19,'control',110,116)	word(20,'sigma B',118,124)	word(21,'activity',126,133)	word(22,'in',135,136)	word(23,'response',138,145)	word(24,'to',147,148)	word(25,'environmental',150,162)	word(26,'stress',164,169)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'sigB')	lemma(2,'structural')	lemma(3,'gene')	lemma(4,'sigB')	lemma(5,'lie')	lemma(6,'in')	lemma(7,'an')	lemma(8,'operon')	lemma(9,'with')	lemma(10,'three')	lemma(11,'other')	lemma(12,'gene')	lemma(13,'whose')	lemma(14,'product')	lemma(15,'have')	lemma(16,'be')	lemma(17,'show')	lemma(18,'to')	lemma(19,'control')	lemma(20,'sigB')	lemma(21,'activity')	lemma(22,'in')	lemma(23,'response')	lemma(24,'to')	lemma(25,'environmental')	lemma(26,'stress')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_in:V-N',5,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,1)	relation('comp_with:V-N',5,12)	relation('comp_to:N-N',23,26)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,2)	relation('appos',3,4)	relation('comp_to:V_PASS-V',17,19)	relation('comp_in:V-N',19,23)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',17,14)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,10)	relation('subj:V-N',5,3)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',26,25)	relation('obj:V-N',19,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,11)	relation('comp_of:N-N',14,12)

ID	8093697-3
sentence	Primer extension analysis suggested that the cwlB operon is transcribed by E sigma D and E sigma A, the former transcripts being predominants at the exponential growth phase.
words	word(0,'Primer',0,5)	word(1,'extension',7,15)	word(2,'analysis',17,24)	word(3,'suggested',26,34)	word(4,'that',36,39)	word(5,'the',41,43)	word(6,'cwlB',45,48)	word(7,'operon',50,55)	word(8,'is',57,58)	word(9,'transcribed',60,70)	word(10,'by',72,73)	word(11,'E sigma D',75,83)	word(12,'and',85,87)	word(13,'E sigma A',89,97)	word(14,'the',100,102)	word(15,'former',104,109)	word(16,'transcripts',111,121)	word(17,'being',123,127)	word(18,'predominants',129,140)	word(19,'at',142,143)	word(20,'the',145,147)	word(21,'exponential',149,159)	word(22,'growth',161,166)	word(23,'phase',168,172)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Primer')	lemma(1,'extension')	lemma(2,'analysis')	lemma(3,'suggest')	lemma(4,'that')	lemma(5,'the')	lemma(6,'cwlB')	lemma(7,'operon')	lemma(8,'be')	lemma(9,'transcribe')	lemma(10,'by')	lemma(11,'E sigma D')	lemma(12,'and')	lemma(13,'E sigma A')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'former')	lemma(16,'transcript')	lemma(17,'being')	lemma(18,'predominants')	lemma(19,'at')	lemma(20,'the')	lemma(21,'exponential')	lemma(22,'growth')	lemma(23,'phase')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',23,22)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',9,13)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',16,18)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',9,7)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',22,21)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',9,11)	relation('comp_at:N-N',18,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('subj:V-N',3,2)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,15)

ID	8169223-4
sentence	The predicted CheV gene product contains an amino-terminal CheW homologous domain linked to a response regulator domain of the CheY family, suggesting that either or both of these functions are duplicated.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'predicted',4,12)	word(2,'CheV',14,17)	word(3,'gene',19,22)	word(4,'product',24,30)	word(5,'contains',32,39)	word(6,'an',41,42)	word(7,'amino-terminal',44,57)	word(8,'CheW',59,62)	word(9,'homologous',64,73)	word(10,'domain',75,80)	word(11,'linked',82,87)	word(12,'to',89,90)	word(13,'a',92,92)	word(14,'response',94,101)	word(15,'regulator',103,111)	word(16,'domain',113,118)	word(17,'of',120,121)	word(18,'the',123,125)	word(19,'CheY',127,130)	word(20,'family',132,137)	word(21,'suggesting',140,149)	word(22,'that',151,154)	word(23,'either',156,161)	word(24,'or',163,164)	word(25,'both',166,169)	word(26,'of',171,172)	word(27,'these',174,178)	word(28,'functions',180,188)	word(29,'are',190,192)	word(30,'duplicated',194,203)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'predict')	lemma(2,'CheV')	lemma(3,'gene')	lemma(4,'product')	lemma(5,'contain')	lemma(6,'an')	lemma(7,'amino-terminal')	lemma(8,'CheW')	lemma(9,'homologous')	lemma(10,'domain')	lemma(11,'link')	lemma(12,'to')	lemma(13,'a')	lemma(14,'response')	lemma(15,'regulator')	lemma(16,'domain')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'the')	lemma(19,'CheY')	lemma(20,'family')	lemma(21,'suggest')	lemma(22,'that')	lemma(23,'either')	lemma(24,'or')	lemma(25,'both')	lemma(26,'of')	lemma(27,'these')	lemma(28,'function')	lemma(29,'be')	lemma(30,'duplicate')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADJ-N',9,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',25,28)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',11,10)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',30,23)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',30,25)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('comp_to:V_PASS-N',11,16)	relation('subj:V-N',5,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,20)	relation('obj:V-N',5,10)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',4,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',20,19)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)

ID	8169223-5
sentence	Transcription of cheV initiates from a sigma D-dependent promoter element both in vivo and in vitro, and expression of a cheV-lacZ fusion is completely dependent on sigD.
words	word(0,'Transcription',0,12)	word(1,'of',14,15)	word(2,'cheV',17,20)	word(3,'initiates',22,30)	word(4,'from',32,35)	word(5,'a',37,37)	word(6,'sigma D',39,45)	word(7,'dependent',47,55)	word(8,'promoter',57,64)	word(9,'element',66,72)	word(10,'both',74,77)	word(11,'in',79,80)	word(12,'vivo',82,85)	word(13,'and',87,89)	word(14,'in',91,92)	word(15,'vitro',94,98)	word(16,'and',101,103)	word(17,'expression',105,114)	word(18,'of',116,117)	word(19,'a',119,119)	word(20,'cheV',121,124)	word(21,'lacZ',126,129)	word(22,'fusion',131,136)	word(23,'is',138,139)	word(24,'completely',141,150)	word(25,'dependent',152,160)	word(26,'on',162,163)	word(27,'sigD',165,168)
lemmas	lemma(0,'transcription')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'cheV')	lemma(3,'initiate')	lemma(4,'from')	lemma(5,'a')	lemma(6,'sigD')	lemma(7,'dependent')	lemma(8,'promoter')	lemma(9,'element')	lemma(10,'both')	lemma(11,'in')	lemma(12,'vivo')	lemma(13,'and')	lemma(14,'in')	lemma(15,'vitro')	lemma(16,'and')	lemma(17,'expression')	lemma(18,'of')	lemma(19,'a')	lemma(20,'cheV')	lemma(21,'lacZ')	lemma(22,'fusion')	lemma(23,'be')	lemma(24,'completely')	lemma(25,'dependent')	lemma(26,'on')	lemma(27,'sigD')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADJ-ADV',25,24)	relation('comp_from:V-N',3,9)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',25,27)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('comp_in:V-N',3,12)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,21)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',7,6)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',17,25)	relation('comp_of:N-N',17,22)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,20)	relation('comp_in:V-N',3,15)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)

ID	8231806-2
sentence	In vivo expression of the spoIIG promoter is activated shortly after the onset of sporulation and is dependent on kinA, spo0F, spo0B and spo0A genes.
words	word(0,'In',0,1)	word(1,'vivo',3,6)	word(2,'expression',8,17)	word(3,'of',19,20)	word(4,'the',22,24)	word(5,'spoIIG',26,31)	word(6,'promoter',33,40)	word(7,'is',42,43)	word(8,'activated',45,53)	word(9,'shortly',55,61)	word(10,'after',63,67)	word(11,'the',69,71)	word(12,'onset',73,77)	word(13,'of',79,80)	word(14,'sporulation',82,92)	word(15,'and',94,96)	word(16,'is',98,99)	word(17,'dependent',101,109)	word(18,'on',111,112)	word(19,'kinA',114,117)	word(20,'spo0F',120,124)	word(21,'spo0B',127,131)	word(22,'and',133,135)	word(23,'spo0A',137,141)	word(24,'genes',143,147)
lemmas	lemma(0,'in')	lemma(1,'vivo')	lemma(2,'expression')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'the')	lemma(5,'spoIIG')	lemma(6,'promoter')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'activate')	lemma(9,'shortly')	lemma(10,'after')	lemma(11,'the')	lemma(12,'onset')	lemma(13,'of')	lemma(14,'sporulation')	lemma(15,'and')	lemma(16,'be')	lemma(17,'dependent')	lemma(18,'on')	lemma(19,'kinA')	lemma(20,'spo0F')	lemma(21,'spo0B')	lemma(22,'and')	lemma(23,'spo0A')	lemma(24,'gene')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,19)	relation('comp_on:ADJ-N',17,24)	relation('comp_after:V_PASS-N',8,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('comp_in:N-N',2,1)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,14)	relation('comp_of:N-N',2,6)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',2,17)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,21)	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',8,9)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',8,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',24,23)

ID	8289242-7
sentence	spoVD transcription appears to occur from a promoter recognized by the sigma E form of RNA polymerase.
words	word(0,'spoVD',0,4)	word(1,'transcription',6,18)	word(2,'appears',20,26)	word(3,'to',28,29)	word(4,'occur',31,35)	word(5,'from',37,40)	word(6,'a',42,42)	word(7,'promoter',44,51)	word(8,'recognized',53,62)	word(9,'by',64,65)	word(10,'the',67,69)	word(11,'sigma E',71,77)	word(12,'form',79,82)	word(13,'of',84,85)	word(14,'RNA',87,89)	word(15,'polymerase',91,100)
lemmas	lemma(0,'spoVD')	lemma(1,'transcription')	lemma(2,'appear')	lemma(3,'to')	lemma(4,'occur')	lemma(5,'from')	lemma(6,'a')	lemma(7,'promoter')	lemma(8,'recognize')	lemma(9,'by')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'sigE')	lemma(12,'form')	lemma(13,'of')	lemma(14,'RNA')	lemma(15,'polymerase')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',4,1)	relation('comp_from:V-N',4,7)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',8,12)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)

ID	8320224-5
sentence	Reconstitution analysis of sigma E purified from the sporulating cell extracts and vegetative core RNA polymerase showed that sigma E recognizes the P2 promoter.
words	word(0,'Reconstitution',0,13)	word(1,'analysis',15,22)	word(2,'of',24,25)	word(3,'sigma E',27,33)	word(4,'purified',35,42)	word(5,'from',44,47)	word(6,'the',49,51)	word(7,'sporulating',53,63)	word(8,'cell',65,68)	word(9,'extracts',70,77)	word(10,'and',79,81)	word(11,'vegetative',83,92)	word(12,'core',94,97)	word(13,'RNA',99,101)	word(14,'polymerase',103,112)	word(15,'showed',114,119)	word(16,'that',121,124)	word(17,'sigma E',126,132)	word(18,'recognizes',134,143)	word(19,'the',145,147)	word(20,'P2',149,150)	word(21,'promoter',152,159)
lemmas	lemma(0,'reconstitution')	lemma(1,'analysis')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'sigE')	lemma(4,'purify')	lemma(5,'from')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'sporulate')	lemma(8,'cell')	lemma(9,'extract')	lemma(10,'and')	lemma(11,'vegetative')	lemma(12,'core')	lemma(13,'RNA')	lemma(14,'polymerase')	lemma(15,'show')	lemma(16,'that')	lemma(17,'sigE')	lemma(18,'recognize')	lemma(19,'the')	lemma(20,'P2')	lemma(21,'promoter')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,3)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',4,9)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('comp_from:V_PASS-N',4,14)	relation('obj:V-N',18,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',12,11)	relation('subj:V-N',15,1)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('subj:V-N',18,17)

ID	8320224-8
sentence	These results indicate that spoVE expression in sporulating cells is controlled essentially by sigma E-associated RNA polymerase.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'results',6,12)	word(2,'indicate',14,21)	word(3,'that',23,26)	word(4,'spoVE',28,32)	word(5,'expression',34,43)	word(6,'in',45,46)	word(7,'sporulating',48,58)	word(8,'cells',60,64)	word(9,'is',66,67)	word(10,'controlled',69,78)	word(11,'essentially',80,90)	word(12,'by',92,93)	word(13,'sigma E',95,101)	word(14,'associated',103,112)	word(15,'RNA',114,116)	word(16,'polymerase',118,127)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'result')	lemma(2,'indicate')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'spoVE')	lemma(5,'expression')	lemma(6,'in')	lemma(7,'sporulate')	lemma(8,'cell')	lemma(9,'be')	lemma(10,'control')	lemma(11,'essentially')	lemma(12,'by')	lemma(13,'sigE')	lemma(14,'associate')	lemma(15,'RNA')	lemma(16,'polymerase')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',10,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('comp_in:N-N',5,8)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',10,5)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',14,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,14)

ID	8460143-9
sentence	RsbW efficiently blocked sigma B-dependent transcription but only if it was incubated with sigma B prior to the addition of the core enzyme.
words	word(0,'RsbW',0,3)	word(1,'efficiently',5,15)	word(2,'blocked',17,23)	word(3,'sigma B',25,31)	word(4,'dependent',33,41)	word(5,'transcription',43,55)	word(6,'but',57,59)	word(7,'only',61,64)	word(8,'if',66,67)	word(9,'it',69,70)	word(10,'was',72,74)	word(11,'incubated',76,84)	word(12,'with',86,89)	word(13,'sigma B',91,97)	word(14,'prior',99,103)	word(15,'to',105,106)	word(16,'the',108,110)	word(17,'addition',112,119)	word(18,'of',121,122)	word(19,'the',124,126)	word(20,'core',128,131)	word(21,'enzyme',133,138)
lemmas	lemma(0,'RsbW')	lemma(1,'efficiently')	lemma(2,'block')	lemma(3,'sigB')	lemma(4,'dependent')	lemma(5,'transcription')	lemma(6,'but')	lemma(7,'only')	lemma(8,'if')	lemma(9,'it')	lemma(10,'be')	lemma(11,'incubate')	lemma(12,'with')	lemma(13,'sigB')	lemma(14,'prior')	lemma(15,'to')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'addition')	lemma(18,'of')	lemma(19,'the')	lemma(20,'core')	lemma(21,'enzyme')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',11,9)	relation('subj:V-N',2,0)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,7)	relation('obj:V-N',2,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',5,4)	relation('comp_with:V_PASS-N',11,13)	relation('mod:V-ADV',2,1)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',4,3)	relation('comp_of:N-N',17,21)	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',11,14)	relation('comp_to:ADV-N',14,17)

ID	8501065-3
sentence	We conclude that spoIIM is a member of the sigma E regulon and that it may be transcribed exclusively by E sigma E.
words	word(0,'We',0,1)	word(1,'conclude',3,10)	word(2,'that',12,15)	word(3,'spoIIM',17,22)	word(4,'is',24,25)	word(5,'a',27,27)	word(6,'member',29,34)	word(7,'of',36,37)	word(8,'the',39,41)	word(9,'sigma E',43,49)	word(10,'regulon',51,57)	word(11,'and',59,61)	word(12,'that',63,66)	word(13,'it',68,69)	word(14,'may',71,73)	word(15,'be',75,76)	word(16,'transcribed',78,88)	word(17,'exclusively',90,100)	word(18,'by',102,103)	word(19,'E sigma E',105,113)
lemmas	lemma(0,'we')	lemma(1,'conclude')	lemma(2,'that')	lemma(3,'spoIIM')	lemma(4,'be')	lemma(5,'a')	lemma(6,'member')	lemma(7,'of')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'sigE')	lemma(10,'regulon')	lemma(11,'and')	lemma(12,'that')	lemma(13,'it')	lemma(14,'may')	lemma(15,'be')	lemma(16,'transcribe')	lemma(17,'exclusively')	lemma(18,'by')	lemma(19,'E sigma E')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',16,17)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',3,6)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',16,19)	relation('comp_of:N-N',6,10)	relation('subj:V-N',1,0)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',16,13)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)

ID	8631668-3
sentence	Activation of sigma E requires expression of the sigma F-directed gene spoIIR.
words	word(0,'Activation',0,9)	word(1,'of',11,12)	word(2,'sigma E',14,20)	word(3,'requires',22,29)	word(4,'expression',31,40)	word(5,'of',42,43)	word(6,'the',45,47)	word(7,'sigma F',49,55)	word(8,'directed',57,64)	word(9,'gene',66,69)	word(10,'spoIIR',71,76)
lemmas	lemma(0,'activation')	lemma(1,'of')	lemma(2,'sigE')	lemma(3,'require')	lemma(4,'expression')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'sigF')	lemma(8,'direct')	lemma(9,'gene')	lemma(10,'spoIIR')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',4,10)	relation('comp_of:N-N',0,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('obj:V-N',3,4)	relation('subj:V-N',3,0)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',9,8)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',8,7)

ID	8752328-4
sentence	The gbsA and gbsB genes are transcribed in the same direction, are separated by a short intergenic region, and are likely to form an operon.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'gbsA',4,7)	word(2,'and',9,11)	word(3,'gbsB',13,16)	word(4,'genes',18,22)	word(5,'are',24,26)	word(6,'transcribed',28,38)	word(7,'in',40,41)	word(8,'the',43,45)	word(9,'same',47,50)	word(10,'direction',52,60)	word(11,'are',63,65)	word(12,'separated',67,75)	word(13,'by',77,78)	word(14,'a',80,80)	word(15,'short',82,86)	word(16,'intergenic',88,97)	word(17,'region',99,104)	word(18,'and',107,109)	word(19,'are',111,113)	word(20,'likely',115,120)	word(21,'to',122,123)	word(22,'form',125,128)	word(23,'an',130,131)	word(24,'operon',133,138)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'gbsA')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'gbsB')	lemma(4,'gene')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'transcribe')	lemma(7,'in')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'same')	lemma(10,'direction')	lemma(11,'be')	lemma(12,'separate')	lemma(13,'by')	lemma(14,'a')	lemma(15,'short')	lemma(16,'intergenic')	lemma(17,'region')	lemma(18,'and')	lemma(19,'be')	lemma(20,'likely')	lemma(21,'to')	lemma(22,'form')	lemma(23,'an')	lemma(24,'operon')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:ADJ-V',20,22)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',17,15)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',12,17)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',6,10)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,20)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',17,16)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',12,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,1)	relation('obj:V-N',22,24)

ID	9004507-2
sentence	In some conditions, this gene can be transcribed by RNA polymerase associated with either sigma F or sigma G, in contrast to previous studies implying exclusive control by sigma G.
words	word(0,'In',0,1)	word(1,'some',3,6)	word(2,'conditions',8,17)	word(3,'this',20,23)	word(4,'gene',25,28)	word(5,'can',30,32)	word(6,'be',34,35)	word(7,'transcribed',37,47)	word(8,'by',49,50)	word(9,'RNA',52,54)	word(10,'polymerase',56,65)	word(11,'associated',67,76)	word(12,'with',78,81)	word(13,'either',83,88)	word(14,'sigma F',90,96)	word(15,'or',98,99)	word(16,'sigma G',101,107)	word(17,'in',110,111)	word(18,'contrast',113,120)	word(19,'to',122,123)	word(20,'previous',125,132)	word(21,'studies',134,140)	word(22,'implying',142,149)	word(23,'exclusive',151,159)	word(24,'control',161,167)	word(25,'by',169,170)	word(26,'sigma G',172,178)
lemmas	lemma(0,'in')	lemma(1,'some')	lemma(2,'condition')	lemma(3,'this')	lemma(4,'gene')	lemma(5,'can')	lemma(6,'be')	lemma(7,'transcribe')	lemma(8,'by')	lemma(9,'RNA')	lemma(10,'polymerase')	lemma(11,'associate')	lemma(12,'with')	lemma(13,'either')	lemma(14,'sigF')	lemma(15,'or')	lemma(16,'sigG')	lemma(17,'in')	lemma(18,'contrast')	lemma(19,'to')	lemma(20,'previous')	lemma(21,'study')	lemma(22,'imply')	lemma(23,'exclusive')	lemma(24,'control')	lemma(25,'by')	lemma(26,'sigG')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_by:N-N',24,26)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('comp_with:V_PASS-N',11,14)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',7,2)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',21,20)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',7,10)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',7,4)	relation('comp_to:N-N',18,21)	relation('obj:V-N',22,24)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',7,18)	relation('comp_with:V_PASS-N',11,16)	relation('subj:V-N',22,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',24,23)

ID	9006059-4
sentence	Two strong SpoIIID-binding sites were mapped in the spoVD promoter region, one overlapping the -35 region and the other encompassing the -10 region and the transcriptional start site.
words	word(0,'Two',0,2)	word(1,'strong',4,9)	word(2,'SpoIIID',11,17)	word(3,'binding',19,25)	word(4,'sites',27,31)	word(5,'were',33,36)	word(6,'mapped',38,43)	word(7,'in',45,46)	word(8,'the',48,50)	word(9,'spoVD',52,56)	word(10,'promoter',58,65)	word(11,'region',67,72)	word(12,'one',75,77)	word(13,'overlapping',79,89)	word(14,'the',91,93)	word(15,'-35',95,97)	word(16,'region',99,104)	word(17,'and',106,108)	word(18,'the',110,112)	word(19,'other',114,118)	word(20,'encompassing',120,131)	word(21,'the',133,135)	word(22,'-10',137,139)	word(23,'region',141,146)	word(24,'and',148,150)	word(25,'the',152,154)	word(26,'transcriptional',156,170)	word(27,'start',172,176)	word(28,'site',178,181)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Two')	lemma(1,'strong')	lemma(2,'SpoIIID')	lemma(3,'bind')	lemma(4,'site')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'map')	lemma(7,'in')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'spoVD')	lemma(10,'promoter')	lemma(11,'region')	lemma(12,'one')	lemma(13,'overlap')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'-35')	lemma(16,'region')	lemma(17,'and')	lemma(18,'the')	lemma(19,'other')	lemma(20,'encompass')	lemma(21,'the')	lemma(22,'-10')	lemma(23,'region')	lemma(24,'and')	lemma(25,'the')	lemma(26,'transcriptional')	lemma(27,'start')	lemma(28,'site')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',28,26)	relation('obj:V-N',20,23)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',28,27)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,4)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('subj:V-N',20,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',3,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',23,22)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',6,11)	relation('obj:V-N',13,16)	relation('subj:V-N',13,12)	relation('obj:V-N',20,28)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)

ID	9271869-5
sentence	Two promoters are involved in transcriptional initiation, the sigma A-dependent upstream promoter contributes to the basal level during growth, whereas the sigma B-dependent downstream promoter is induced after different stress conditions.
words	word(0,'Two',0,2)	word(1,'promoters',4,12)	word(2,'are',14,16)	word(3,'involved',18,25)	word(4,'in',27,28)	word(5,'transcriptional',30,44)	word(6,'initiation',46,55)	word(7,'the',58,60)	word(8,'sigma A',62,68)	word(9,'dependent',70,78)	word(10,'upstream',80,87)	word(11,'promoter',89,96)	word(12,'contributes',98,108)	word(13,'to',110,111)	word(14,'the',113,115)	word(15,'basal',117,121)	word(16,'level',123,127)	word(17,'during',129,134)	word(18,'growth',136,141)	word(19,'whereas',144,150)	word(20,'the',152,154)	word(21,'sigma B',156,162)	word(22,'dependent',164,172)	word(23,'downstream',174,183)	word(24,'promoter',185,192)	word(25,'is',194,195)	word(26,'induced',197,203)	word(27,'after',205,209)	word(28,'different',211,219)	word(29,'stress',221,226)	word(30,'conditions',228,237)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Two')	lemma(1,'promoter')	lemma(2,'be')	lemma(3,'involve')	lemma(4,'in')	lemma(5,'transcriptional')	lemma(6,'initiation')	lemma(7,'the')	lemma(8,'sigA')	lemma(9,'dependent')	lemma(10,'upstream')	lemma(11,'promoter')	lemma(12,'contribute')	lemma(13,'to')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'basal')	lemma(16,'level')	lemma(17,'during')	lemma(18,'growth')	lemma(19,'whereas')	lemma(20,'the')	lemma(21,'sigB')	lemma(22,'dependent')	lemma(23,'downstream')	lemma(24,'promoter')	lemma(25,'be')	lemma(26,'induce')	lemma(27,'after')	lemma(28,'different')	lemma(29,'stress')	lemma(30,'condition')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADJ-N',9,8)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',3,6)	relation('comp_after:V_PASS-N',26,30)	relation('comp_during:V-N',12,18)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',24,22)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',6,5)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',3,1)	relation('comp_to:V-N',12,16)	relation('mod_att:N-N',30,29)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',24,23)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',26,24)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',11,9)	relation('subj:V-N',12,11)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',22,21)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,15)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',30,28)

ID	9287022-1
sentence	Bacillus subtilis Spo0A activates transcription from both sigmaA- and sigmaH-dependent promoters.
words	word(0,'Bacillus subtilis',0,16)	word(1,'Spo0A',18,22)	word(2,'activates',24,32)	word(3,'transcription',34,46)	word(4,'from',48,51)	word(5,'both',53,56)	word(6,'sigmaA',58,63)	word(7,'and',66,68)	word(8,'sigmaH',70,75)	word(9,'dependent',77,85)	word(10,'promoters',87,95)
lemmas	lemma(0,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(1,'Spo0A')	lemma(2,'activate')	lemma(3,'transcription')	lemma(4,'from')	lemma(5,'both')	lemma(6,'sigA')	lemma(7,'and')	lemma(8,'sigH')	lemma(9,'dependent')	lemma(10,'promoter')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:ADJ-N',9,6)	relation('comp_from:N-N',3,10)	relation('obj:V-N',2,3)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)

ID	9324264-2
sentence	Among them are two sigma factors, sigmaE and sigmaK, and a DNA-binding protein, SpoIIID.
words	word(0,'Among',0,4)	word(1,'them',6,9)	word(2,'are',11,13)	word(3,'two',15,17)	word(4,'sigma',19,23)	word(5,'factors',25,31)	word(6,'sigmaE',34,39)	word(7,'and',41,43)	word(8,'sigmaK',45,50)	word(9,'and',53,55)	word(10,'a',57,57)	word(11,'DNA-binding',59,69)	word(12,'protein',71,77)	word(13,'SpoIIID',80,86)
lemmas	lemma(0,'amongst')	lemma(1,'them')	lemma(2,'be')	lemma(3,'two')	lemma(4,'sigma')	lemma(5,'factor')	lemma(6,'sigE')	lemma(7,'and')	lemma(8,'sigK')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'a')	lemma(11,'DNA-binding')	lemma(12,'protein')	lemma(13,'SpoIIID')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('appos',5,6)	relation('appos',12,13)	relation('appos',5,8)	relation('subj:V-N',2,5)	relation('subj:V-N',2,12)	relation('comp_among:V-N',2,1)

ID	9422603-5
sentence	DNA sequences upstream of P1 were similar to consensus SigK-dependent promoters, while P2 and P3 were similar to consensus SigE-dependent promoters.
words	word(0,'DNA',0,2)	word(1,'sequences',4,12)	word(2,'upstream',14,21)	word(3,'of',23,24)	word(4,'P1',26,27)	word(5,'were',29,32)	word(6,'similar',34,40)	word(7,'to',42,43)	word(8,'consensus',45,53)	word(9,'SigK',55,58)	word(10,'dependent',60,68)	word(11,'promoters',70,78)	word(12,'while',81,85)	word(13,'P2',87,88)	word(14,'and',90,92)	word(15,'P3',94,95)	word(16,'were',97,100)	word(17,'similar',102,108)	word(18,'to',110,111)	word(19,'consensus',113,121)	word(20,'SigE',123,126)	word(21,'dependent',128,136)	word(22,'promoters',138,146)
lemmas	lemma(0,'DNA')	lemma(1,'sequence')	lemma(2,'upstream')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'P1')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'similar')	lemma(7,'to')	lemma(8,'consensus')	lemma(9,'SigK')	lemma(10,'dependent')	lemma(11,'promoter')	lemma(12,'while')	lemma(13,'P2')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'P3')	lemma(16,'be')	lemma(17,'similar')	lemma(18,'to')	lemma(19,'consensus')	lemma(20,'SigE')	lemma(21,'dependent')	lemma(22,'promoter')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',17,22)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',10,9)	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',6,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',22,19)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',15,17)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',13,17)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',22,21)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',21,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',11,8)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',1,6)	relation('comp_of:ADJ-N',2,4)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',1,0)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',1,2)

ID	9535080-4
sentence	The start point of transcription is preceded by potential promoter sequences for sigmaA, sigmaB and sigmaD.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'start',4,8)	word(2,'point',10,14)	word(3,'of',16,17)	word(4,'transcription',19,31)	word(5,'is',33,34)	word(6,'preceded',36,43)	word(7,'by',45,46)	word(8,'potential',48,56)	word(9,'promoter',58,65)	word(10,'sequences',67,75)	word(11,'for',77,79)	word(12,'sigmaA',81,86)	word(13,'sigmaB',89,94)	word(14,'and',96,98)	word(15,'sigmaD',100,105)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'start')	lemma(2,'point')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'transcription')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'precede')	lemma(7,'by')	lemma(8,'potential')	lemma(9,'promoter')	lemma(10,'sequence')	lemma(11,'for')	lemma(12,'sigA')	lemma(13,'sigB')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'sigD')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',6,2)	relation('comp_for:N-N',10,15)	relation('comp_of:N-N',2,4)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',6,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',2,1)	relation('comp_for:N-N',10,13)	relation('comp_for:N-N',10,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,9)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,8)

ID	9555886-6
sentence	These data indicate that katX is an additional member of the forespore-specific sigmaF regulon.
words	word(0,'These',0,4)	word(1,'data',6,9)	word(2,'indicate',11,18)	word(3,'that',20,23)	word(4,'katX',25,28)	word(5,'is',30,31)	word(6,'an',33,34)	word(7,'additional',36,45)	word(8,'member',47,52)	word(9,'of',54,55)	word(10,'the',57,59)	word(11,'forespore-specific',61,78)	word(12,'sigmaF',80,85)	word(13,'regulon',87,93)
lemmas	lemma(0,'these')	lemma(1,'datum')	lemma(2,'indicate')	lemma(3,'that')	lemma(4,'katX')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'an')	lemma(7,'additional')	lemma(8,'member')	lemma(9,'of')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'forespore-specific')	lemma(12,'sigF')	lemma(13,'regulon')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',4,8)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('comp_of:N-N',8,13)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',13,11)

ID	9658001-2
sentence	One class of Spo0A-activated promoter, which includes spoIIEp, is recognized by RNA polymerase associated with the primary sigma factor, sigma A (sigmaA); the second, which includes spoIIAp, is recognized by RNA polymerase associated with an early-sporulation sigma factor, sigma H (sigmaH).
words	word(0,'One',0,2)	word(1,'class',4,8)	word(2,'of',10,11)	word(3,'Spo0A',13,17)	word(4,'activated',19,27)	word(5,'promoter',29,36)	word(6,'which',39,43)	word(7,'includes',45,52)	word(8,'spoIIEp',54,60)	word(9,'is',63,64)	word(10,'recognized',66,75)	word(11,'by',77,78)	word(12,'RNA',80,82)	word(13,'polymerase',84,93)	word(14,'associated',95,104)	word(15,'with',106,109)	word(16,'the',111,113)	word(17,'primary',115,121)	word(18,'sigma',123,127)	word(19,'factor',129,134)	word(20,'sigma A',137,143)	word(21,'sigmaA',146,151)	word(22,'the',155,157)	word(23,'second',159,164)	word(24,'which',167,171)	word(25,'includes',173,180)	word(26,'spoIIAp',182,188)	word(27,'is',191,192)	word(28,'recognized',194,203)	word(29,'by',205,206)	word(30,'RNA',208,210)	word(31,'polymerase',212,221)	word(32,'associated',223,232)	word(33,'with',234,237)	word(34,'an',239,240)	word(35,'early-sporulation',242,258)	word(36,'sigma',260,264)	word(37,'factor',266,271)	word(38,'sigma H',274,280)	word(39,'sigmaH',283,288)
lemmas	lemma(0,'One')	lemma(1,'class')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'Spo0A')	lemma(4,'activate')	lemma(5,'promoter')	lemma(6,'which')	lemma(7,'include')	lemma(8,'spoIIEp')	lemma(9,'be')	lemma(10,'recognize')	lemma(11,'by')	lemma(12,'RNA')	lemma(13,'polymerase')	lemma(14,'associate')	lemma(15,'with')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'primary')	lemma(18,'sigma')	lemma(19,'factor')	lemma(20,'sigA')	lemma(21,'sigA')	lemma(22,'the')	lemma(23,'second')	lemma(24,'which')	lemma(25,'include')	lemma(26,'spoIIAp')	lemma(27,'be')	lemma(28,'recognize')	lemma(29,'by')	lemma(30,'RNA')	lemma(31,'polymerase')	lemma(32,'associate')	lemma(33,'with')	lemma(34,'an')	lemma(35,'early-sporulation')	lemma(36,'sigma')	lemma(37,'factor')	lemma(38,'sigH')	lemma(39,'sigH')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',28,23)	relation('comp_with:V_PASS-N',14,19)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',10,13)	relation('appos',19,20)	relation('mod_att:N-N',19,18)	relation('appos',20,21)	relation('comp_with:V_PASS-N',32,37)	relation('mod_att:N-N',19,17)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',10,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',37,35)	relation('appos',38,39)	relation('appos',37,38)	relation('subj:V-N',25,23)	relation('obj:V-N',7,8)	relation('subj:V-N',7,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',13,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',37,36)	relation('obj:V-N',25,26)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',32,31)	relation('comp_by:V_PASS-N',28,31)	relation('mod_att:N-N',31,30)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',14,13)	relation('mod:ADJ-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',5,4)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,5)

ID	9683503-1
sentence	tagA, tagD, and tuaA operons are responsible for the synthesis of cell wall anionic polymer, teichoic acid, and teichuronic acid, respectively, in Bacillus subtilis.
words	word(0,'tagA',0,3)	word(1,'tagD',6,9)	word(2,'and',12,14)	word(3,'tuaA',16,19)	word(4,'operons',21,27)	word(5,'are',29,31)	word(6,'responsible',33,43)	word(7,'for',45,47)	word(8,'the',49,51)	word(9,'synthesis',53,61)	word(10,'of',63,64)	word(11,'cell',66,69)	word(12,'wall',71,74)	word(13,'anionic',76,82)	word(14,'polymer',84,90)	word(15,'teichoic',93,100)	word(16,'acid',102,105)	word(17,'and',108,110)	word(18,'teichuronic',112,122)	word(19,'acid',124,127)	word(20,'respectively',130,141)	word(21,'in',144,145)	word(22,'Bacillus subtilis',147,163)
lemmas	lemma(0,'tagA')	lemma(1,'tagD')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'tuaA')	lemma(4,'operon')	lemma(5,'be')	lemma(6,'responsible')	lemma(7,'for')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'synthesis')	lemma(10,'of')	lemma(11,'cell')	lemma(12,'wall')	lemma(13,'anionic')	lemma(14,'polymer')	lemma(15,'teichoic')	lemma(16,'acid')	lemma(17,'and')	lemma(18,'teichuronic')	lemma(19,'acid')	lemma(20,'respectively')	lemma(21,'in')	lemma(22,'Bacillus subtilis')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,15)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',14,13)	relation('comp_of:N-N',9,16)	relation('comp_of:N-N',9,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,0)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',19,18)	relation('comp_in:ADJ-N',6,22)	relation('comp_of:N-N',9,19)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,12)	relation('comp_for:ADJ-N',6,9)

ID	9696771-5
sentence	ykzA is therefore another example of a gene common to the RpoS and sigmaB stress regulons of E. coli and B. subtilis, respectively.
words	word(0,'ykzA',0,3)	word(1,'is',5,6)	word(2,'therefore',8,16)	word(3,'another',18,24)	word(4,'example',26,32)	word(5,'of',34,35)	word(6,'a',37,37)	word(7,'gene',39,42)	word(8,'common',44,49)	word(9,'to',51,52)	word(10,'the',54,56)	word(11,'RpoS',58,61)	word(12,'and',63,65)	word(13,'sigmaB',67,72)	word(14,'stress',74,79)	word(15,'regulons',81,88)	word(16,'of',90,91)	word(17,'E. coli',93,99)	word(18,'and',101,103)	word(19,'B. subtilis',105,115)	word(20,'respectively',118,129)
lemmas	lemma(0,'ykzA')	lemma(1,'be')	lemma(2,'therefore')	lemma(3,'another')	lemma(4,'example')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'a')	lemma(7,'gene')	lemma(8,'common')	lemma(9,'to')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'RpoS')	lemma(12,'and')	lemma(13,'sigB')	lemma(14,'stress')	lemma(15,'regulons')	lemma(16,'of')	lemma(17,'E. coli')	lemma(18,'and')	lemma(19,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(20,'respectively')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:ADJ-N',8,15)	relation('comp_of:N-N',15,17)	relation('mod_post:N-ADJ',7,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',15,19)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,11)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',0,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',15,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',14,13)	relation('comp_of:N-N',4,7)

ID	9748255-5
sentence	Both Spo0A~P and Spo0ABD stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter 10-fold more efficiently than Spo0A.
words	word(0,'Both',0,3)	word(1,'Spo0A~P',5,11)	word(2,'and',13,15)	word(3,'Spo0ABD',17,23)	word(4,'stimulated',25,34)	word(5,'transcription',36,48)	word(6,'from',50,53)	word(7,'the',55,57)	word(8,'spoIIG',59,64)	word(9,'promoter',66,73)	word(10,'10-fold',75,81)	word(11,'more',83,86)	word(12,'efficiently',88,98)	word(13,'than',100,103)	word(14,'Spo0A',105,109)
lemmas	lemma(0,'both')	lemma(1,'Spo0A~P')	lemma(2,'and')	lemma(3,'Spo0ABD')	lemma(4,'stimulate')	lemma(5,'transcription')	lemma(6,'from')	lemma(7,'the')	lemma(8,'spoIIG')	lemma(9,'promoter')	lemma(10,'10-fold')	lemma(11,'more')	lemma(12,'efficiently')	lemma(13,'than')	lemma(14,'Spo0A')
syntactic_relations	relation('obj:V-N',4,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('subj:V-N',4,1)	relation('mod:V-ADV',4,12)	relation('subj:V-N',4,3)	relation('comp_from:N-N',5,9)	relation('comp_than:ADV-N',12,14)	relation('mod:ADV-ADV',12,11)	relation('mod:ADV-ADV',11,10)

ID	9767589-2
sentence	The developmental programme of these two cells involves the compartmentalized activities of sigmaE in the larger mother cell and of sigmaF in the smaller prespore.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'developmental',4,16)	word(2,'programme',18,26)	word(3,'of',28,29)	word(4,'these',31,35)	word(5,'two',37,39)	word(6,'cells',41,45)	word(7,'involves',47,54)	word(8,'the',56,58)	word(9,'compartmentalized',60,76)	word(10,'activities',78,87)	word(11,'of',89,90)	word(12,'sigmaE',92,97)	word(13,'in',99,100)	word(14,'the',102,104)	word(15,'larger',106,111)	word(16,'mother',113,118)	word(17,'cell',120,123)	word(18,'and',125,127)	word(19,'of',129,130)	word(20,'sigmaF',132,137)	word(21,'in',139,140)	word(22,'the',142,144)	word(23,'smaller',146,152)	word(24,'prespore',154,161)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'developmental')	lemma(2,'programme')	lemma(3,'of')	lemma(4,'these')	lemma(5,'two')	lemma(6,'cell')	lemma(7,'involve')	lemma(8,'the')	lemma(9,'compartmentalize')	lemma(10,'activity')	lemma(11,'of')	lemma(12,'sigE')	lemma(13,'in')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'large')	lemma(16,'mother')	lemma(17,'cell')	lemma(18,'and')	lemma(19,'of')	lemma(20,'sigF')	lemma(21,'in')	lemma(22,'the')	lemma(23,'small')	lemma(24,'prespore')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V-N',7,2)	relation('comp_of:N-N',2,6)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',10,9)	relation('comp_in:N-N',10,24)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',2,1)	relation('comp_in:N-N',10,17)	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,12)	relation('obj:V-N',7,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('comp_of:N-N',10,20)

ID	10197994-8 
sentence	At its peak, the concentration of sigmaF was some twofold higher than that of sigmaA.
words	word(0,'At',0,1)	word(1,'its',3,5)	word(2,'peak',7,10)	word(3,'the',13,15)	word(4,'concentration',17,29)	word(5,'of',31,32)	word(6,'sigmaF',34,39)	word(7,'was',41,43)	word(8,'some',45,48)	word(9,'twofold',50,56)	word(10,'higher',58,63)	word(11,'than',65,68)	word(12,'that',70,73)	word(13,'of',75,76)	word(14,'sigmaA',78,83)
lemmas	lemma(0,'at')	lemma(1,'its')	lemma(2,'peak')	lemma(3,'the')	lemma(4,'concentration')	lemma(5,'of')	lemma(6,'sigF')	lemma(7,'be')	lemma(8,'some')	lemma(9,'twofold')	lemma(10,'high')	lemma(11,'than')	lemma(12,'that')	lemma(13,'of')	lemma(14,'sigA')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_at:V-N',7,2)	relation('mod_pred:N-ADJ',4,10)	relation('mod:ADV-ADV',9,8)	relation('mod:ADJ-ADV',10,9)	relation('comp_than:ADJ-N',10,12)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,14)

ID	10220166-11
sentence	YhdN shows weak similarities to potassium ion channel proteins and YocK shows resemblance to the DnaK suppressor protein DksA.
words	word(0,'YhdN',0,3)	word(1,'shows',5,9)	word(2,'weak',11,14)	word(3,'similarities',16,27)	word(4,'to',29,30)	word(5,'potassium',32,40)	word(6,'ion',42,44)	word(7,'channel',46,52)	word(8,'proteins',54,61)	word(9,'and',63,65)	word(10,'YocK',67,70)	word(11,'shows',72,76)	word(12,'resemblance',78,88)	word(13,'to',90,91)	word(14,'the',93,95)	word(15,'DnaK',97,100)	word(16,'suppressor',102,111)	word(17,'protein',113,119)	word(18,'DksA',121,124)
lemmas	lemma(0,'YhdN')	lemma(1,'show')	lemma(2,'weak')	lemma(3,'similarity')	lemma(4,'to')	lemma(5,'potassium')	lemma(6,'ion')	lemma(7,'channel')	lemma(8,'protein')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'YocK')	lemma(11,'show')	lemma(12,'resemblance')	lemma(13,'to')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'DnaK')	lemma(16,'suppressor')	lemma(17,'protein')	lemma(18,'DksA')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:N-N',12,18)	relation('comp_to:N-N',3,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('subj:V-N',11,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',17,16)	relation('obj:V-N',11,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',3,2)	relation('mod_att:N-N',7,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',16,15)	relation('obj:V-N',1,3)	relation('subj:V-N',1,0)

ID	10463184-1
sentence	The yfhP, yfhQ (mutY homologue), yfhS and yfhR (oxidoreductase homologue) genes, which are located upstream of the sspE locus, have been identified in the Bacillus subtilis genome.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'yfhP',4,7)	word(2,'yfhQ',10,13)	word(3,'mutY',16,19)	word(4,'homologue',21,29)	word(5,'yfhS',33,36)	word(6,'and',38,40)	word(7,'yfhR',42,45)	word(8,'oxidoreductase',48,61)	word(9,'homologue',63,71)	word(10,'genes',74,78)	word(11,'which',81,85)	word(12,'are',87,89)	word(13,'located',91,97)	word(14,'upstream',99,106)	word(15,'of',108,109)	word(16,'the',111,113)	word(17,'sspE',115,118)	word(18,'locus',120,124)	word(19,'have',127,130)	word(20,'been',132,135)	word(21,'identified',137,146)	word(22,'in',148,149)	word(23,'the',151,153)	word(24,'Bacillus subtilis',155,171)	word(25,'genome',173,178)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'yfhP')	lemma(2,'yfhQ')	lemma(3,'mutY')	lemma(4,'homologue')	lemma(5,'yfhS')	lemma(6,'and')	lemma(7,'yfhR')	lemma(8,'oxidoreductase')	lemma(9,'homologue')	lemma(10,'gene')	lemma(11,'which')	lemma(12,'be')	lemma(13,'locate')	lemma(14,'upstream')	lemma(15,'of')	lemma(16,'the')	lemma(17,'sspE')	lemma(18,'locus')	lemma(19,'have')	lemma(20,'be')	lemma(21,'identify')	lemma(22,'in')	lemma(23,'the')	lemma(24,'Bacillus subtilis')	lemma(25,'genome')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod:V_PASS-ADV',13,14)	relation('mod_att:N-N',25,24)	relation('comp_of:ADV-N',14,18)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',13,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,5)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,2)	relation('appos',7,9)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,7)	relation('mod_att:N-N',18,17)	relation('appos',2,4)	relation('comp_in:V_PASS-N',21,25)	relation('mod_att:N-N',10,1)	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,10)	relation('mod_att:N-N',4,3)

ID	10481082-2
sentence	The genes were designated tap1, flgD, flgE, orf4, motA, motB, fliL, fliM, fliY, orf10 and fliP.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'genes',4,8)	word(2,'were',10,13)	word(3,'designated',15,24)	word(4,'tap1',26,29)	word(5,'flgD',32,35)	word(6,'flgE',38,41)	word(7,'orf4',44,47)	word(8,'motA',50,53)	word(9,'motB',56,59)	word(10,'fliL',62,65)	word(11,'fliM',68,71)	word(12,'fliY',74,77)	word(13,'orf10',80,84)	word(14,'and',86,88)	word(15,'fliP',90,93)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'gene')	lemma(2,'be')	lemma(3,'designate')	lemma(4,'tap1')	lemma(5,'flgD')	lemma(6,'flgE')	lemma(7,'orf4')	lemma(8,'motA')	lemma(9,'motB')	lemma(10,'fliL')	lemma(11,'fliM')	lemma(12,'fliY')	lemma(13,'orf10')	lemma(14,'and')	lemma(15,'fliP')
syntactic_relations	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,11)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,5)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,15)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,6)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,13)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,4)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,8)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,7)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,9)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,12)	relation('mod_pred:N-N',1,10)

ID	10503549-8
sentence	The results indicate an overlap between the sigmaB regulon and the sigmaF regulon, and the physiological implications of this overlap are discussed.
words	word(0,'The',0,2)	word(1,'results',4,10)	word(2,'indicate',12,19)	word(3,'an',21,22)	word(4,'overlap',24,30)	word(5,'between',32,38)	word(6,'the',40,42)	word(7,'sigmaB',44,49)	word(8,'regulon',51,57)	word(9,'and',59,61)	word(10,'the',63,65)	word(11,'sigmaF',67,72)	word(12,'regulon',74,80)	word(13,'and',83,85)	word(14,'the',87,89)	word(15,'physiological',91,103)	word(16,'implications',105,116)	word(17,'of',118,119)	word(18,'this',121,124)	word(19,'overlap',126,132)	word(20,'are',134,136)	word(21,'discussed',138,146)
lemmas	lemma(0,'the')	lemma(1,'result')	lemma(2,'indicate')	lemma(3,'an')	lemma(4,'overlap')	lemma(5,'between')	lemma(6,'the')	lemma(7,'sigB')	lemma(8,'regulon')	lemma(9,'and')	lemma(10,'the')	lemma(11,'sigF')	lemma(12,'regulon')	lemma(13,'and')	lemma(14,'the')	lemma(15,'physiological')	lemma(16,'implication')	lemma(17,'of')	lemma(18,'this')	lemma(19,'overlap')	lemma(20,'be')	lemma(21,'discuss')
syntactic_relations	relation('subj:V_PASS-N',21,16)	relation('subj:V-N',2,1)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('mod_att:N-N',8,7)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',16,15)	relation('obj:V-N',2,4)	relation('comp_between:N-N',4,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',16,19)	relation('comp_between:N-N',4,12)

ID	10754235-4
sentence	In addition to others, it represses abrB and activates spoIIA and spoIIE transcription.
words	word(0,'In',0,1)	word(1,'addition',3,10)	word(2,'to',12,13)	word(3,'others',15,20)	word(4,'it',23,24)	word(5,'represses',26,34)	word(6,'abrB',36,39)	word(7,'and',41,43)	word(8,'activates',45,53)	word(9,'spoIIA',55,60)	word(10,'and',62,64)	word(11,'spoIIE',66,71)	word(12,'transcription',73,85)
lemmas	lemma(0,'in')	lemma(1,'addition')	lemma(2,'to')	lemma(3,'other')	lemma(4,'it')	lemma(5,'repress')	lemma(6,'abrB')	lemma(7,'and')	lemma(8,'activate')	lemma(9,'spoIIA')	lemma(10,'and')	lemma(11,'spoIIE')	lemma(12,'transcription')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_to:N-N',1,3)	relation('subj:V-N',5,4)	relation('comp_in:V-N',5,1)	relation('obj:V-N',5,6)	relation('subj:V-N',8,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,9)	relation('obj:V-N',8,12)	relation('mod_att:N-N',12,11)	relation('comp_in:V-N',8,1)

ID	10878124-3
sentence	Phylogenetic analyses of various sigma factor sequences from endospore-forming bacteria revealed that homologues of sigma(E), sigma(K) and sigma(G) clustered together regardless of genus, suggesting a common origin of sporulation sigma factors.
words	word(0,'Phylogenetic',0,11)	word(1,'analyses',13,20)	word(2,'of',22,23)	word(3,'various',25,31)	word(4,'sigma',33,37)	word(5,'factor',39,44)	word(6,'sequences',46,54)	word(7,'from',56,59)	word(8,'endospore-forming',61,77)	word(9,'bacteria',79,86)	word(10,'revealed',88,95)	word(11,'that',97,100)	word(12,'homologues',102,111)	word(13,'of',113,114)	word(14,'sigma(E)',116,123)	word(15,'sigma(K)',126,133)	word(16,'and',135,137)	word(17,'sigma(G)',139,146)	word(18,'clustered',148,156)	word(19,'together',158,165)	word(20,'regardless',167,176)	word(21,'of',178,179)	word(22,'genus',181,185)	word(23,'suggesting',188,197)	word(24,'a',199,199)	word(25,'common',201,206)	word(26,'origin',208,213)	word(27,'of',215,216)	word(28,'sporulation',218,228)	word(29,'sigma',230,234)	word(30,'factors',236,242)
lemmas	lemma(0,'phyletic')	lemma(1,'analysis')	lemma(2,'of')	lemma(3,'various')	lemma(4,'sigma')	lemma(5,'factor')	lemma(6,'sequence')	lemma(7,'from')	lemma(8,'endospore-forming')	lemma(9,'bacterium')	lemma(10,'reveal')	lemma(11,'that')	lemma(12,'homologue')	lemma(13,'of')	lemma(14,'sigE')	lemma(15,'sigK')	lemma(16,'and')	lemma(17,'sigG')	lemma(18,'cluster')	lemma(19,'together')	lemma(20,'regardless')	lemma(21,'of')	lemma(22,'genus')	lemma(23,'suggest')	lemma(24,'a')	lemma(25,'common')	lemma(26,'origin')	lemma(27,'of')	lemma(28,'sporulation')	lemma(29,'sigma')	lemma(30,'factor')
syntactic_relations	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,17)	relation('subj:V-N',10,1)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',26,25)	relation('mod_att:N-N',5,4)	relation('mod_att:N-N',9,8)	relation('comp_of:N-N',1,6)	relation('mod_att:N-N',6,5)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,14)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',1,0)	relation('mod_att:N-N',30,28)	relation('mod_att:N-ADJ',4,3)	relation('subj:V-N',18,12)	relation('obj:V-N',23,26)	relation('comp_of:V-N',18,26)	relation('comp_from:N-N',6,9)	relation('mod_att:N-N',30,29)	relation('mod:V-ADV',18,19)	relation('comp_of:N-N',12,15)	relation('comp_of:N-N',26,30)	relation('mod:V-ADV',18,20)	relation('comp_of:ADV-N',20,22)	relation('mod:V-V',18,23)