YeastIP database allows the search and the retrieval of sequences for taxonomy and phylogeny with the ‘Sequence search’ tool. It can be questioned by:
o Keywords:
The ‘Keywords’ box is not case sensitive but is sensitive to spelling. For example, the word ‘cndida’ will return no match, but ‘cAndI’ will. Keywords interrogate the database in all fields: name, synonym, markers, collection numbers (most of them are CBS number) etc...
o Genus or species name:
For a specific search by species name or markers, it is recommanded to use the second part of the search tool. For a search by name, select the genus first, then the associated species name. The latter will appear in a list box. If the species of interest does not appear, either it is not in the database, or it is a synonym of the name registered in the database. To choose between, these two possibilities, the user should questioned the database by keyword.
o Clade:
The database also provides all registered strains in clades (see Phylogeny of yeast clade). Markers may be associated to this search, but it is better to avoid a search combining clade and genus: if the selected genus does not belong to the selected clade, the search will fail.
Markers may be chosen either as a unique search field (for example, display all D1/D2 present in the database), or combined with a clade or genus/species search (for example, all the Candida D1/D2, or D1/D2 + ITS of Saccharomyces cerevisiae...).
Finally, the search may be refined by selecting only type strains with the checkbox (check by default).
The result will be displayed in a table containing the accession number, the status of the strain (type, neotype... see 1.b.), the current species name to which the strain belongs, the collection number of the strain, the name of the marker, the length of the sequence and the most recent synonym of the species cited in NCBI.
Sequence file may be opened by clicking the accession number to visualize information as described in 1.d. Checkboxes allow to select sequences to be retrieved in fasta format, or to select the strain to be displayed in the marker table (see 4.a.). The display of a strain in the marker table can simply be done by checking only one sequence of this strain.
The number of retrievable sequences is voluntary limited to 500. If your search contains more than 500 sequences, please select more criteria to refine the search. For special demands, please contact us.
DNA markers do not provide the same information in taxonomy and phylogeny. While D1/D2 is the most widely used marker to describe species, it is not very reliable for phylogeny because of its small size. Other markers are good performers in phylogenetic analysis, but they are not available for a large number of species. Markers typically used for barcoding (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, mtCOX II…) are not reliable markers for phylogeny: for instance the size of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 can be very variable, and mitochondrial markers such as mtCOX II may be misleading because of the peculiar inheritance and the mode of evolution of mitochondrial DNA. Concatenation of coding sequences like ACT1, RPB1, RPB2 or TEF1-alpha provide good robust phylogeny.
Most of the oligonucleotide primers used to amplify DNA and generate sequences present in the database can be found in the work by:
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.Taylor et al., 1990, PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications, (ed. M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, T.J. White), pp. 315–322. Academic press, San Diego).
Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J., 1998, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek , 73:331-371.
Partial sequence analysis of the actin gene and its potential for studying the phylogeny of Candida species and their teleomorphs. Daniel H.M., Sorell T.C. and Meyer W., 2001, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 51:1593-1606.
Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analysis. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J., 2003, FEMS Yeast Res., 3:417-432.
Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora. Kurztman C.P., 2003, FEMS Yeast Res., 4:233-245.
Evaluation of ribosomal RNA and actin gene sequences for the identification of ascomycetous yeasts. Daniel H.M. and Meyer W., 2003, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 86:71-78.
Multigene phylogenetic analysis of Trichomonascus, Wickerhamiella and Zygoascus yeast clade, and the proposal of Sugiyamaella gen. nov. and fourteen new species combinations. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J., 2007, FEMS Yeast Res., 7:141-154.
Re-examining the phylogeny of clinically relevant Candida species and allied genera based on multigene analysis. Tsui C.K.M., Daniel H.M., Robert V. and Meyer W., 2008, FEMS Yeast Res., 8:651-659.
Phylogeny and evolution of medical species of Candida and related taxa: a multigenic analysis.Diezman et al., 200), J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5624-5635.
Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov.Kurtzman C.P. et al., 2008, FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 939-954.
The genus Candida contains species that have no sexual state. The Candida genus is not monophyletic, therefore Candida species may be closely related to various species that have a sexual state. A clade is a taxon, which is made of a genus containing species with a sexual state and phylogenetically related Candida species.
The establishment of a taxonomic position of a definite species is best done with clades. A phylogenetic tree derived from various publications by Kurtzman and his collaborators is shown below.
Most of the information on the taxonomy of hemiascomycetous yeast can be found in the 5th edition of "The Yeast, a Taxonomical
study" by Kurtzman C.P., Boekhout T. and Fell J. (2011), Elsevier Amsterdam. The most recent changes in yeast taxonomy can be found in
Kurtzmann C.P. (2010), Phylogeny of the ascomycetous yeasts and the renaming of Pichia anomala to Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Antonie
Van Leeuwenhoek, 99: 13-23. The impact of genomics on yeast taxonomy has been recently reviewed by Casaregola S., Weiss S. and Morel G.
(2011), New perspectives in hemiascomycetous yeast taxonomy. C. R. Biol. Aug-Sep; (8-9):590-8. In this publication, all the changes of species
names since 1998 have also been reviewed.
Phylogeny.fr:
Dereeper A., Guignon V., Blanc G., Audic S., Buffet S., Chevenet F., Dufayard J.-F., Guindon S., Lefort V., Lescot M., Claverie J.-M., Gascuel O. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008 Jul 1; 36 (Web Server Issue):W465-9. Epub 2008 Apr 19.